Friday, February 25, 2022

The Ukraine war in living color

 One of the things that Russia apparently has not thought about this week is using its prowess at cyber warfare to shut off the Ukrainian internet. Whether the omission was intentional or not, the videos and pictures streaming out from the combat zones provide a window into a modern conventional war that is hopefully something that will be rarely glimpsed. As someone observed on Thursday, “Now I know what it would have been like if social media had existed on September 1, 1939.”

The vivid images of the Russian onslaught that are emerging often look like something out of a war movie. Some would have to be seen to be believed. In sum, they provide an indelible record of Vladimir Putin’s crimes against Ukraine and humanity. Here then, are some of the most memorable of the videos tweeted from Ukraine on the first days of the war.

In this video, a Russian armored vehicle runs over a civilian Ukrainian automobile. Unbelievably, a subsequent shows that the driver of the car, a senior citizen, survived.

In the next tweet, video shows heavy fighting in the northeastern Ukraine city of Sumy as the town burns. The video is evidence of the fierce resistance being given by the Ukrainian defenders. Russian armor reportedly attacked the town in the early morning hours of Thursday, February 24. Although the Russians captured the city, there are reports that Ukrainian forces recaptured it early Friday morning.

In the next video, a fighter-bomber is dropping bombs when it is engaged by anti-aircraft fire, which spits a stream of tracers at the airplane. I’m not sure what type of aircraft this is, but the twin tail and straight wing greatly resemble the American A-10. The plane maneuvers and drops flares to distract surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) as the radar-guided ground fire tracks it. The aircraft apparently escapes unscathed.

Next, Russian Mi-8 helicopters transporting airborne troops are engaged by heat-seeking SAMs and small arms fire. The Mi-8, codenamed “Hip” by NATO, discharge flares and appear to continue unharmed. Note that the helicopters are flying below the level of the Ukrainian defense position on the mountain.

In another helicopter video, smoke billows as Mi-8s attack the Hostomel airport near Kyiv. The Hips are transports but can be armed with guns and rockets.

Not all of the helicopters got away unscathed. The next video shows a Russian Ka-52 “Alligator” attack helicopter. The Ka-52 is the Russian equivalent to the AH-64 Apache. This one is heavily damaged. There is no word on what happened to the crew.

In the next video, a Ukrainian woman confronts armed Russian soldiers on the streets of Henichesk, a port city in southern Ukraine. A translation of the woman’s words shows that the woman railed at the invaders, calling them “fascists” and telling them to put sunflower seeds in their pockets so that when they die, sunflowers, the Ukrainian national flower, will bloom where they are buried.

“You will lie down here with the seeds,” the woman angrily says. “You came to my land. Do you understand? You are occupiers. You are enemies.”

By now, the whole world knows the story of the defenders of Snake Island. In an act of courage that rivals the defenders of Bastogne and the Alamo, the 13 Ukrainians told a Russian warship to perform an anatomically impossible act when it demanded their surrender. They were all killed in the subsequent fighting. Below is the audio of the exchange.

One of the Ukrainian soldiers on Snake Island recorded this selfie video as the battle began.

In a chilling video, a woman recorded a Russian fighter-bomber as it made an attack run and launched an air-to-ground missile at a target near her house. The aircraft appears to be an Su-27 “Flanker.” A baby cries as the woman runs for cover.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was first introduced to most Americans as the man who begged The Former Guy for more Javelin missiles in The Perfect Transcript at the center of the Ukraine scandal that led to Trump’s first impeachment. We saw him again today taking up arms in Kyiv to fight the invaders and telling the world that this might be the last time we see him alive.

Believe it or not, this guy used to be a comedian. Today, he has become a leader in the mold of George Washington.

Footage of civilians seeking cover from airstrikes in the subways reminds me of WWII photos of Londoners taking cover from the Blitz.

Morale is not so great on the Russian side. There are reports of Russian soldiers surrendering, including an entire brigade, and telling their Ukrainian captors that they didn’t even know they were going to war.

A look at compelling videos of the day would not be complete without showing Russian anti-war protests. The day began with pictures of individuals with signs. These people were quickly arrested and removed. Several pictures showed protesters being led away by Russian police. But later in the day, thousands of people poured into the streets to register their opposition to Putin’s (something Donald Trump has yet to do by the way). Showing up to protest Putin in Russia takes no less courage than picking up a rifle in Ukraine.

The pictures and videos coming out of Ukraine are a testament to the courage of the Ukrainian people and their determination to remain free.

If the brave Ukrainians are to prevail, however, they will need help from the outside. A successful conclusion to the war will require the Western nations to pressure Putin from the outside both economically and militarily. It will also require peace-loving Russians to rise up and oppose this immoral war and their criminal leader.

But all that is the easy part. Most of all, it is going to require the Ukrainians to stay strong and stand alone.

To the Ukrainians, I say, “Залишайся живим. Ми вам допоможемо. Нехай Бог благословить і оберігає Україну.”

From the Racket


Tuesday, February 22, 2022

Putin chooses war

 Vladimir Putin recognized the independence of breakaway Ukrainian provinces and announced his intention to send in Russian forces to “maintain peace.” The long-watched-for Russian invasion of Ukraine is underway and Vladimir Putin has chosen war, just as we always suspected that he would.

But that’s really misstating the issue. Putin did not start a war this week. The blatant Russian occupation of parts of Ukraine is really a continuation of the war that he started back in 2014. That year, Putin’s unmarked “little green men” occupied Crimea, which was then annexed by Russia, and Russian proxies launched an insurgency into Donbas, Donetsk, and Luhansk, the provinces that Putin is formally occupying this week.

While the fighting faded from the front pages, it didn’t stop. Fighting in Ukraine has continued to cost hundreds of lives each year since 2014. In total, the death toll for Ukraine has exceeded 13,000 people, about a quarter of them civilians. In a country of 44 million, that number represents a large loss of life.

Putin’s aggression is no respecter of parties either. Some have made much of the facts that the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in 1979 when Carter was president, Chechnya under Clinton in 1994, Crimea under Obama in 2014, and is now invading parts of Ukraine under Biden. But this omits that both the Second Chechen War and the Russo-Georgia War occurred during the Bush Administration and that Russia intervened in Syria while Trump was president… and while the US had troops fighting ISIS in the same area.

The fact that the Russo-Ukrainian War has been simmering for almost a decade now makes it laughable historical revisionism that the Russian bear would not be on the move if Donald Trump had won a second term. In reality, Russia kept up the proxy war throughout Donald Trump’s entire tenure as well as launching numerous cyberattacks on Ukraine during that time that targeted both military weapons and civilian infrastructure. In 2018, Russian naval vessels attacked Ukrainian patrol boats and took 24 sailors prisoner, holding them for months. Suffice it to say that Trump wasn’t strong on Ukraine.

Add to that that the reports from former White House staffers that Trump was planning to leave NATO if he won (or stole) a second term, Trump’s continued obeisance to Putin, and the fact that the isolationist said as recently as January that Ukraine is “a European problem.” The sum total paints a picture of a president who would not stand up to Vladimir Putin. When US forces withdrew from Syria on Trump’s orders, the Russians moved into our old bases.

Trump apologists point out that the Trump Administration was first to approve the sale of Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine, but the truth is more complex. Trump reportedly opposed the deal and the terms of the sale reportedly prohibited the weapons from being used against the pro-Russia separatists and required them to be based in Western Ukraine, far from the fighting where they were needed. It was only a few months ago, in November 2021, that Ukraine confirmed that Javelins were being used against the Russia-backed rebels. Trump’s hold on military aid to Ukraine for personal political reasons was what triggered his fist impeachment.

On top of all that, as I’ve pointed out in the recent pieces, today it is the Republicans whose voices are loudest in opposing the potential use of American force against the invaders and who are even justifying Putin’s actions. I’ve even heard that some on the right are cheering for Putin to win and Biden to fail, although I haven’t seen this myself. If there are such people out there, I would suggest that it is incredibly self-centered to wish a nation into Russian slavery so that your party can score political points.

We really should all be on the same side here. That should be the side of freedom against authoritarian aggression. This isn’t about our domestic politics and the next election, it’s about who will control vast swaths of Ukraine for the foreseeable future. It’s about a country that only recently escaped the Russian sphere of influence and is now being dragged back in against its will.

At this point, it’s difficult to say what the future holds, but I think the smart money is that Russia will gobble up a few eastern provinces and then stop for a while. I don’t expect the Ukrainians to let this territory go without a fight. After all, they’ve been fighting for eight years already.

Nobody wants a war between the US and Russia, not even Putin. Most of us also don’t want to see a Russian dictator take over a free country. Fortunately, there is a lot of middle ground between going to war and doing nothing.

We can expect to see more US aid to Ukraine in addition to 300 more Javelin missiles that were delivered in late January, presumably without the “do not shoot at Russians” clause in the sales contract. What we won’t see is a deployment of American soldiers to the front lines. In addition to military aid, crippling sanctions that target Russian financial institutions, imports, and exports would be the best course of action. Make it bloody for Putin to take parts of Ukraine and economically painful for Russia to keep its prizes.

While I disagree with a lot of things that the Biden Administration has done, in Ukraine they seem to be hitting the right tone. After a few early missteps, Biden has consistently and strongly opposed Putin’s moves and kept the NATO allies together in their response. So far that response has included a round of sanctions that target banks and wealthy individuals by the UK and the halt of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline by Germany. The Biden Administration has called Putin’s move an “invasion” and said that the US response will be “swift and severe.

Stay tuned.

Share

Over the weekend, I went back to Manhattan for the first time since before the pandemic started. It’s always fun to visit New York City (but I couldn’t live there.) I’ve made some trips to the region, but this was my first chance to cross over the Hudson into New York proper.

The Big Apple was as bright and shiny as ever but not nearly as crowded as it used to be. Even Times Square wasn’t wall-to-wall people. That could be partly due to the cold and windy weather.

One of the most crowded places that I’ve been in the past two years was a dim sum restaurant in lower Manhattan. If Times Square wasn’t crowded, this place was.

Masks were optional in most places, although I did get asked for my vaccination card in a couple of restaurants. I was happy to provide it as well as to wear a mask when requested. In fact, the mask helped to keep my face from freezing when we were walking around.

Two things that had changed since my last visit were the streetside stands that COVID testing that replaced some of the ubiquitous hot dog vendors and the presence of marijuana vendor trucks. In fact, I caught a mobile COVID test site parked next to a weed wagon in an image that seems to sum up new New York. I didn’t partake of either.

(David Thornton)

It’s always nice to visit New York for a few days. I’ll be ready to go again soon and I’m glad to see that the pandemic seems to be fading in what was its American Ground Zero.

From the Racket

Friday, February 18, 2022

Putin, Durham, Mazars, and Omicron! Oh my!

 Today, I wanted to make several quick hits on a few topics. The first item on the list is Ukraine.

Earlier this week, Russia said that it was starting to withdraw some troops from the border area where forces had been massing for months. But you didn’t really think that was going to happen, did you? That would be too easy. The newest information from NATO is that not only are the Russians not withdrawing but an additional 7,000 troops have been added to the region.

Additionally, the Russians have recently built a new field hospital and camps capable of housing thousands of new soldiers. Britain’s Sky News reports that Russian military police units and blood stockpiles have also been deployed towards the border. These developments are significant because hospitals and blood would be needed to treat wounded soldiers and the MP unit, the Conflict Intelligence Team, is a counterinsurgency unit that saw service in Syria. The CIT would be used to secure areas after the initial advance by combat troops.

All of these developments could be signs of an impending invasion or they could be part of a massive exercise. When an army is parked on the border, it’s difficult to know whether it is there for training or combat until it starts to move.

But wait! There’s more!

A few weeks ago, US intelligence officials said that they had information that the Russians planned a false flag operation using “a very graphic propaganda video.” That prediction may have come true yesterday.

Russia claims to have discovered 130 possible mass graves in the Donbas region in which Russian-speaking civilians were allegedly murdered and buried by Ukrainian forces. As ABC News points out, this is highly unlikely because Russian sympathizers have occupied the area for the past seven years. It seems a little too convenient that these graves were overlooked for the better part of a decade and suddenly turn up just when Vladimir Putin needs a reason to invade.

As I was writing this, the Wall Street Journal reported that Russia has formally accused Ukraine of the “genocide of the Russian-speaking population of Donbas” in UN documents.

You may remember the phrase “false flag” from pretty much every conspiracy theory ever, but there are real instances of false flag operations intended to provide justification for an aggressive war. One of the most famous of these was the Gleiwitz incident in which German SS troops dressed as Poles and attacked a German radio station near the Polish border. The next day, World War II started as Germans used the incident as a justification to invade Poland.

While the Russian claims are laughable to the free world, they may not be so transparent to those living under Putin’s tightly-controlled media. The allegations of mass graves and murdered ethnic Russians may be more intended to whip up anti-Ukrainian sentiment among the population of both Russia and ethnic Russians in Ukraine than to justify an invasion to the world, but anything that muddies the waters and gives Putin a fig leaf of pretext could be used to cover his naked aggression.

Further, Ukraine was hit by a massive cyberattack on Tuesday that it called the largest in its history. Russia, which has engaged in cyber warfare against Ukraine for years, is the prime suspect in the attack, but because the attacks are so common, it may not necessarily presage an imminent conventional invasion.

As I was writing this, new information came in that the Russian embassy in Kyiv may be destroying sensitive documents as a plume of white smoke escaped the compound. This would be a precaution to be taken before the outbreak of hostilities.

For a long time, I thought Putin was bluffing and testing, but the new escalations make it seem more likely that he is seriously considering an invasion. We’ll probably know soon because maintaining a large army in the field can be logistically draining.

I don’t know what Putin intends, but I rate the possibility of war as high and increasing. The endgame is emerging and I think we’ll know within a few days if Putin seriously intends to annex all or part of Ukraine.

Share

DURHAM’S DECEPTION?: More information has come out on the Durham filing that I discussed on MondaySussman’s lawyers filed a response alleging that “the Special Counsel seems to be succeeding in his effort to instigate unfair and prejudicial media coverage of Mr. Sussmann’s case” by including allegations that post-date the indictment.

Some of the grittiest details of the filing come in a footnote, which blasts Durham, saying in part, “The Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-2 [the CIA] pertained only to the period of time before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President. Further—and contrary to the Special Counsel’s alleged theory that Mr. Sussmann was acting in concert with the Clinton Campaign—the Motion conveniently overlooks the fact that Mr. Sussmann’s meeting with Agency-2 happened well after the 2016 presidential election, at a time when the Clinton Campaign had effectively ceased to exist.”

In other words, the White House data was from Barack Obama’s White House, not Donald Trump’s and the Clinton campaign no longer existed when Sussman met with the CIA.

The brief also points out that “the Indictment is 27 pages long and reads as though there was a vast conspiracy, involving the Clinton Campaign and Mr. Sussmann… but the Indictment does not charge anyone other than Mr. Sussmann; the Indictment does not charge a conspiracy; and the Indictment does not even charge a fraud.”

“Tellingly, however,” the brief notes, “the Special Counsel has never alleged in the Indictment or subsequently that the data provided by the researchers was manipulated or fabricated, or that Mr. Sussmann had any reason to believe that the allegations he presented to the FBI’s General Counsel were untrue or misleading in any way.”

Unless more indictments follow, Durham has some ‘splaining to do about his very nonstandard filing. There will probably be more to this story, but so far the Durham non-indictment seems to be a tempest in a teapot. Those of us who were skeptical about the interpretations of a vast conspiracy to spy on Donald Trump were justified in our disbelief.

And you heard it here first.


TRUMP’S TAXES: Another recent story is that Donald Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, disavowed financial documents prepared for the Trump Organization over the past decade. In a letter dated February 9, 2022, that became public as part of New York’s investigation into Trump’s accounting practices.

The letter states in part, “While we have not concluded that the various financial statements, as a whole, contain material discrepancies, based upon the totality of the circumstances, we believe our advice to you to no longer rely upon those financial statements is appropriate.”

No charges have been filed, but this could be a confirmation that Trump made material misstatements on financial documents. That could mean that an indictment is in his future.


THE UPSIDE OF OMICRON: A new model by the University of Washington estimates that 73 percent of Americans are now immune to Omicron per the AP. The estimate figures in that about half of eligible Americans have received booster shots while 80 million infections have been confirmed. Many other infections likely went unreported (like my daughter’s after she tested positive with a home test kit).

The report notes that new variants and waning immunity will likely make herd immunity continue to be elusive, but we do have adequate protections after two years of fighting the virus.

“We have changed,” said Ali Mokdad, professor of health metrics sciences at the University of Washington in Seattle. “We have been exposed to this virus and we know how to deal with it.”

“I am optimistic even if we have a surge in summer, cases will go up, but hospitalizations and deaths will not,” he added.

That’s good news indeed. Normal is coming.


TWEET OF THE DAY: Here’s a thought experiment from Atticus Finch. Who do you think are America’s greatest leaders?

From the Racket

The shining city on a hill

 

In my ramblings today, I want to take a break from pandemics, wars, and economic upheaval. It’s Friday so let’s talk about something else, at least until the bombs start falling and the tanks start rolling (which may have happened by the time you read this).

As often happens, Twitter was my muse today. An exchange yesterday reminded me of President Reagan’s farewell address in which he spoke of America as the “shining city upon a hill.” If you’ve never heard Reagan describe his vision for America, you should take a few minutes and watch him do so right now.

A light set on a hill has several effects. One is obviously to dispel the darkness. If the light is bright enough, it can light surrounding areas.

This has limits, however. It takes a really bright and powerful light to brighten a very wide area. If you’ve ever been camping, you know that a lantern can be so bright that it’s painful to look directly at, but that light still doesn’t go very far. If you get more than 10 or 15 feet away from the lantern, you’ll still be stumbling around in the semi-darkness even though there’s a very bright light a short distance away.

Another effect of a bright light set high is to act as a beacon. Examples of this would be lighthouses or the beacon set atop of Castle Anthrax in “Monty Python and the Holy Grail.” Beacons often serve as navigational aids and, like Sir Galahad in the movie, people who are stumbling around in the dark will often follow the light of beacons to its source. After all, light promises warmth and shelter from the gloom of night.

I think that was a big part of Reagan’s point. Part of the Gipper’s vision was a city “teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace.” It stands to reason that many of these people would have followed the light to the city.

As I continued to listen, it underscored just how far the Republican Party has moved since Reagan left office in 1989. Reagan saw “a city with free ports that hummed with commerce and creativity,” but in recent years Republicans have embraced tariffs and trade wars that slowed the activity in those ports. Free trade now has few defenders in either party.

One of the most stark differences between Reagan and today is the president’s vision that “if there had to be city walls, the walls had doors and the doors were open to anyone with the will and the heart to get here.” Too many Republicans today want a wall with a moat and razor wire rather than open doors. Reagan’s words imply defending against invaders but welcoming those who want to be Americans.

“Open” has become a pejorative when discussing immigration and border policy, but the word means different things to different people. To me, it means being accepting of immigrants, but not uncontrolled access. We need welcoming rules for prospective immigrants, but we also need border security and stiff penalties for violators.

To that end, we need comprehensive immigration reform. Democrats want more welcoming immigration rules while Republicans want more border security. The truth is that neither side has the numbers to get what they want without help from the other so both sides elect to continue the status quo with our broken immigration system. An additional factor is that both sides would lose a wedge and fundraising issue if the problem was resolved.

In an era of declining birth rates and fewer native-born Americans interested in pursuing difficult degrees in science, technology, engineering, and math, immigrants are not a drain on American society but are instead a vital part of continuing strong economic growth into the future. The future is going to be built on science and technology but too many young Americans aren’t interested in these subjects. Instead, our colleges and universities train foreign students and then send them back abroad to work for our competitors.

As the Bible points out, it doesn’t make sense to turn on a light and then cover it up (unless you’re up to no good). Along the same lines, we shouldn’t light a beacon and then turn away the “tired, [the] poor, [the] huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
the wretched refuse of your teeming shore
” who flock to American light and who are needed to help us build a new American future.

But our job is not only to ensure that the light is welcoming, we have to make sure that it continues to shine. After eight years in office, President Reagan was able to say, “We made the city stronger, we made the city freer, and we left her in good hands.”

At this point, I don’t think that the current generation can make the same claim. At this point, we have a divided America where talk of civil war is common, and way too many people wistfully ponder a “national divorce.” Such talk was unheard of in Reagan’s day, but I’m sure that he would not have been sympathetic to those stirring the pot with secessionist ideas.

One thing that I could add to Reagan’s comments is that an individual light can be pretty dim on its own, but if you put a lot of small lights together, they give off more light. If you’ve ever been to a candlelight service, you know that a lot of candles, small lights individually, can give off quite a glow. The effect is cumulative for both being able to see and to be seen.

So maybe Reagan’s shining city wasn’t illuminated by one big light source. Maybe the city was lit by millions of smaller lights. Maybe you and I are are what make the city bright. And that is my thought for the day.

Let your little light shine.

Share

OMICRON PLUS?: On a more depressing note, researchers in Japan have found that a new variant of Omicron, BA.2, may be both more contagious and more virulent than Omicron. The new variant may combine easy transmissibility with the serious effects of Delta, CNN reports. The new variant also requires additional laboratory steps to find in testing.

The good news is that real-world data on BA.2 is mixed. The variant has already been found in 74 countries and 47 US states and is dominant in 10 countries. In most of these, hospitalizations and deaths continue to decline, but in at least one, Denmark, where BA.2 is the leading cause of infections, these metrics are trending upwards.

More good news is that antibodies from previous infections and vaccinations seem to hold up against the new bug.


DURHAM DENIAL: The special counsel distanced himself from MAGA Spygate claims in another new filing. Axios has the details.


Tweet of the Day: @RAF_Luton is unparalleled at military aviation satire.




From the Racket

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Four out of five wingnuts agree on Putin

 With Russian troops poised on the border of Ukraine and the Russian government saying, “Move along, nothing to see here,” one would think that most of the world would be united in standing against what appears to be not-imminent-but-soon naked aggression by Vladimir Putin. One would be wrong.

For example, I stumbled across a tweet by the Democratic Socialists of America a few days ago. I had been assured that Joe Biden was a socialist so I assumed that the DSA would have his back. Not so! The socialist group “opposes US brinkmanship in Ukraine, which only further escalates the crisis, and calls for an end to NATO imperialist expansionism.”

It’s interesting that NATO, a defense alliance that has only fought one war in history after the US was attacked on September 11, is accused of escalating the crisis. Russia, on the other hand, which has been consistently attacking Ukraine for much of the past decade, is given a pass.

Old habits die hard, I guess. Back during Cold War I, the world socialist movement was unabashedly pro-Soviet. Beyond that, the Soviets also infiltrated peace movements around the world and used them to protest and lobby against Western military buildups. The peace protesters never seemed to have a problem with the Soviet military.

This may not seem relevant until you remember that Vladimir Putin was a career KGB officer. A lot of those covert asserts that the KGB had in place in the 80s probably still have influence today. Maybe their allegiance isn’t so much to the Comintern as to whoever sits at Russia’s helm at the moment.

That makes it ironic then that many of the MAGA voices on the right are passing along the same pro-Putin talking points as the DSA. For example, Tucker Carlson argued in December that just a little invading by Putin wasn’t necessarily such a bad thing.

"Vladimir Putin does not want Belgium,” Carlson opined. “He just wants to keep his western borders secure. That's why he doesn't want Ukraine to join NATO, and that makes sense."

I guess Ukraine is expendable as long as the Russians don’t threaten imports of Belgian chocolates or French wines, but I wonder if Carlson would apply the same logic if, say, Mexico decided it needed more lebensraum to keep its northern border secure.

More recently, Tucker fretted about US military advisors in Ukraine in the event of war, alleging that the Biden Administration was probably lying about how many Americans were deployed to Ukraine. Over the weekend, Military.com reported that “160 Florida National Guard soldiers, the only known U.S. troops in the country, are being repositioned elsewhere in Europe.”

Another MAGA Republican, Jack Posobiec also sounded the alarm that “drums are beating for US boots on the ground in Ukraine.” I don’t know where Posobiec heard those drums, but I have not heard anyone calling for the deployment of American soldiers to the endangered area.

He certainly didn’t hear it from Joe Biden. The president’s position for months has been that US combat troops will not be deployed to Ukraine, saying bluntly as far back as December, “The idea that the United States is going to unilaterally use force to confront Russia invading Ukraine is not in the cards right now.”

Rather, Biden has threatened other consequences. These would include sanctions and probably military aid to Ukrainian forces as well. The possibility of a long, unpopular quagmire in Ukraine as the Russian economy falters should be sobering to Putin.

In another example of Russian propaganda being spewed by MAGA, Breitbart’s London Deputy Editor, Jack Montgomery, tweeted an accusation that Tbilisi of poking the Russian bear and instigating the 2008 war in which Putin’s army went marching through Georgia. Montgomery’s evidence for his counter-historical claim was a screenshot of a news report that he claimed showed that “Georgia invaded the Russia-aligned separatist region of South Ossetia and Russia intervened.”

Anytime that anyone posts a screenshot of a news article with no identifying source or a link back to the original article, it should raise red flags. I easily found Montgomery’s article in the Sydney (Australia) Morning Herald but the detail that gave away his deception was in the screenshot itself. The August 8 report detailed current fighting, but the war started on August 1 when pro-Russia separatists attacked Georgian police with an IED.

The MAGA voices are following their leader on Russia and Ukraine. In January, Donald Trump called Ukraine “a European problem” in an interview with Glenn Beck. Trump also said that “Russia owns Germany” due to Germany’s dependence on Russia for energy imports.

Fortunately, not all Republicans are willing to roll over for Vladimir Putin. Writing for the Atlantic, David Frum notes that traditional Republicans such as Mitch McConnell and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) have backed Biden in his support for Ukraine. Even trumpy Republicans such as Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) are not on board the Putin Express. Kevin McCarthy has even attacked Biden for being too soft on Russia.

For the most part, there seems to be bipartisan agreement that Biden is handling the Ukraine crisis well (and this is a relief after his disastrous handling of Afghanistan) after some early missteps. The Biden Administration seems to have found the right balance between abandoning another ally and rushing headlong into war.

We can’t see how the crisis will end from here, but the ultimate resolution is going to depend on Vladimir Putin.

Share

LEGAL DOUBLE HEADER: There were two big legal news stories yesterday. First, in a case that will go down in legal history as probably the only time that a witness yelled “Objection!” when Palin tried to suppress a line of questioning about her appearance on “The Masked Singer,” the former vice presidential candidate lost her defamation suit against the New York Times.

The case was a double loss for Palin as the judge dismissed the case and then the jury returned a verdict that the Times was not liable for allegedly defaming Palin. The result underscores the difficulty in meeting the “actual malice” standard in defamation cases. Shoddy research, it seems, does not constitute malice.

In a separate case, families of Sandy Hook victims reached a settlement with Remington Arms in a lawsuit that claimed the company marketed the rifle used in the shooting to young, at-risk males. Under the agreement, the families get $73 million from the company, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2020.

Federal law shields gun manufacturers from liability in most cases.


BRACE YOURSELF: A spokesman for the January 6 commission said that it expects Rudy Giuliani to “cooperate fully” in a statement to CNN. This could get interesting.


From the Racket