Showing posts with label Peter Navarro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Navarro. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 7, 2020

White House Trade Advisor Warned Of Coronavirus Pandemic In Memos As Early As January



Reports are trickling out from the White House about the early warnings that were given regarding a possible Coronavirus pandemic. Several weeks ago, the Washington Post reported that US intelligence agencies raised several red flags in January and February about the outbreak in China. Now, the New York Times reports that White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro penned another higher-level alert.
Per the report, the memo, which was dated January 29, warned that the lack of immunity and vaccines from the COVID-19 virus could lead to a widespread outbreak and risk the lives of “millions” of Americans.
“The lack of immune protection or an existing cure or vaccine would leave Americans defenseless in the case of a full-blown coronavirus outbreak on U.S. soil,” Navarro said in the memo. “This lack of protection elevates the risk of the coronavirus evolving into a full-blown pandemic, imperiling the lives of millions of Americans.”
Navarro laid out options, “Aggressive Containment versus No Containment,” for handling a possible US outbreak with different scenarios. He noted that human and economic costs would be low if a Coronavirus epidemic resembled a seasonal flu outbreak but emphasized that the “risk of a worst-case pandemic scenario should not be overlooked” due to the serious nature of reports on the Chinese outbreak.
Navarro estimated the cost for the no-containment strategy would range from nothing if there was no pandemic to $5.7 trillion for a lethal virus. Containment, in the form of stopping travel from China, was estimated to cost $2.9 billion per month or $34.6 billion for a full year. Navarro estimated a worst-case death toll of 543,000 Americans.
A few days later, on January 31, the Trump Administration announced restrictions on flights from China. Although touted as a ban, The Dispatch points out that Americans and lawful residents were still allowed to enter the country. In fact, it was an American who had traveled to China who had already become the US patient zero for Coronavirus on January 19. Arriving passengers were required to enter through one of 13 specific airports where, the Washington Times reported, they were “waved through immigration, and then simply urged to self-quarantine. It’s like the honor system, but for containing a deadly pandemic.” An additional problem is that by the end of January, the virus had already spread beyond China to 15 countries.
However, there is evidence that the Trump Administration still did not take the looming pandemic seriously. Connecticut Democrat Chris Murphy tweeted that the Administration was not asking for emergency funding to prepare for the virus’ arrival in the US.
“Bottom line,” Murphy said, “They aren’t taking this seriously enough.”
Murphy’s tweet is supported by President Trump’s own words and actions. The president hosted five rallies around the country in February alone played golf four times between the beginning of February and declaring a national emergency on March 13. At the same time, he made numerous assurances that Coronavirus was “under control” in the US and that the “risk is very, very low.”
At a rally on February 28, President Trump called Democratic concerns about a US Coronavirus outbreak “their new hoax.” This was two days after the CDC had confirmed community transmission in the United States after a patient in California tested positive with no travel to outbreak areas or contact with known carriers of the virus.
Other elements of the Trump Administration weren’t moving much faster. The lackluster response to a growing threat may be why Navarro penned a second memo on February 23. In that unsigned memo, the author, who White House staffers say was Navarro, wrote that there was an “increasing probability of a full-blown COVID-19 pandemic that could infect as many as 100 million Americans, with a loss of life of as many as 1.2 million souls.”
The second memo, initially reported by Axios, warned, “This is NOT a time for penny-pinching or horse trading on the Hill.”
In the second memo, Navarro requested an “immediate supplemental appropriation of at least $3 billion” to prepare for the pandemic.
“We can expect to need at least a billion face masks, 200,000 Tyvek suits, and 11,000 ventilator circuits, and 25,000 PAPRs (powered air-purifying respirators)” over a four to six month period, the memo predicted.
It wasn’t until February 24, the day after Navarro’s second memo, that the Administration asked Congress for a $1.25 billion appropriation to prepare for COVID-19. Congress approved $8 billion on March 4 and Trump signed the bill two days later on March 6. An Associated Press review of federal contracts found that the government did not actually order medical supplies until mid-March.
Despite issuing limited travel restrictions on China in January, the Trump Administration seems to have not taken the numerous warnings about the impending health crisis seriously. Unfortunately, those travel restrictions were too little too late. The Administration wasted at least a month and only started to act with urgency when COVID-19 was already raging out of control in the United States.

Originally published on The Resurgent

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Team Trump Tries To Allay Recession Fears


President Trump and his economic advisors fired back against recession predictions over the weekend. Over the past few weeks, recession fears have mounted as prospects for a trade deal with China have dimmed, sparking an 800-point selloff in the stock market and an inverted yield curve for bonds, which is often a leading indicator for economic downturns.

Two top White House advisors made the Sunday talk show rounds yesterday in an attempt to allay concerns about the trade war. Speaking to Chuck Todd on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Chief White House Economic Advisor Larry Kudlow said, "No, I don't see a recession. And let me add just one theme ... Just one theme. We're doing pretty darn well, in my judgment. Let's not be afraid of optimism. It's a funny sign of our times. And I think there's a very optimistic economy going on out there.”

After that appearance, Kudlow popped up on “Fox News Sunday” with Dana Perino, where he again touted the Trump economy, saying, “First of all, I don't see a recession at all. Second of all, the Trump pro-growth program, which I believe has been succeeding lower tax rates, bid rollback of regulations, energy opening, trade reform, we're going to stay with that.”

White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro showed up on CNN’s “State of the Union” with Jake Tapper where he argued that tariffs are “not hurting anybody here” because China was devaluing its currency to a greater degree than the Trump Administration was imposing tariffs.

President Trump also got into the act, telling reporters on Sunday, “We're doing tremendously well. Our consumers are rich.”

“And we're not going to have a recession. But the rest of the world is not doing well as we're doing,” Trump said.

“I think our economy is very, very good,” the president said, but then seemed to acknowledge that the trade war was acting as a brake on the economy, adding, “We can do a lot of things, but if it slowed down it would be because I have to take on China and some other countries. Look, you have other countries that are just as bad as China, the way they treated us.”

When the president had dinner with Apple CEO Tim Cook on Friday, Cook took the opportunity to bend the president’s ear on the upcoming tariffs on consumer electronic products. Cook pointed out that the tariffs would affect Apple more than Korean phone manufacturer Samsung since iPhones are made in China, but Samsung phones are built in several different countries.
“I thought he made a very compelling argument” about the difficulty in competing with Samsung, Trump told Bloomberg. “It’s tough for Apple to pay tariffs if it’s competing with a very good company that’s not.”

This contradicts Trump’s statement to reporters that “In the case of China, China is eating the tariffs. At least so far."

Trump and his advisors crowed over retail sales numbers released last week, which increased for the fifth straight month, but other recent indicators are not so rosy. Job growth was slower than expected in July and housing starts fell by four percent, the third straight month of declines.

Farmers are also showing signs of discontent with the trade war. Gary Wertish, president of the Minnesota Farmers Union, said, “Words and twitters and tweets, that doesn’t pay the farmer’s bills, that doesn’t solve the problem we’re dealing with.

“This would is self-inflicted by our president,” Wertish added. “We definitely agreed with him at the beginning, but it doesn’t appear that there’s a plan B.”

“Short-term, stair-stepped subsidies ... stimulate production but not sales and therefore do little to undo the long-term log jam caused by not selling soybeans to destinations like China, the world’s number one customer.” Lindsay Greiner, the president of the Iowa Soybean Association, said in a statement earlier this year.

The president also addressed concerns about the inverted yield curve, saying, “Also, when you go in and analyze the [bond yield] curve, the curve always means that about two years later, maybe you will go in [to a recession].  That's a long time, two years. But I don't think so. Interest rates are low. I think I could be helped out by the Fed. But the Fed doesn't like helping me too much.”

Navarro denied that there was an inverted yield curve at all, saying, “An inverted yield curve requires a big spread between the short and long. All we have had is a flat curve. It’s a flat curve which is a very weak signal of any possibility.”

Most economists and investors disagree with Navarro. The Wall Street Journal cited uncertainty over the stock market, news that the German economy shrank 0.1 percent in the second quarter, Brexit concerns, and Chinese economic figures as pointing towards a slowing economy and pushing investors towards the more stable bond markets. The Journal noted that the market warning signs are an “omen of the future, not destiny,” however.

The key to averting an economic downturn is for the Trump Administration to find a way to make a trade deal with China and call off the trade war. While some celebrate news of the slowing Chinese economy, the Journal points out, “a Chinese recession would mean a European recession, which would send U.S. growth down too.” As I’ve noted before, the Chinese don’t have to outlast the US economy, they only have to outlast President Trump and, if Trump loses his one unequivocal advantage in the solid economy, his departure in 2021 would be virtually guaranteed.

Unfortunately, the president does not seem ready to declare victory and end the trade war, maintaining that China’s economic pains are “why they want to come to the table,” as well as that “President Xi, I'm sure, likes me very much.”

“Our country is going to be stronger by far than ever before,” Trump insisted. “I mean, if I wanted to make a bad deal and settle on China, the market would go up. But it wouldn't be the right thing to do. I'm just not ready to make a deal yet. China would like to make a deal, I'm not ready."

Originally published on the Resurgent