Showing posts with label Ben Sasse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ben Sasse. Show all posts

Friday, October 16, 2020

Ben Sasse unloads on Trump…and it may be a sign of things to come

 In a sign of things to come, Nebraska Republican Ben Sasse let President Trump have it with both barrels this week. Senator Sasse spoke truths rarely voiced by Republicans for the past four years in a phone call with constituents earlier this week, but, as the president sinks in the polls, Sasse’s criticism may become more common as vulnerable Republican incumbents attempt to save (and distance) themselves.

Sasse, who was an outspoken critic of Trump earlier in his presidency, was responding to a constituent who asked, “Why do you have to criticize him [President Trump] so much?”

Sasse began by responding, “We should distinguish between policy agreement and policy disagreement and then also long-term political implications as well.”

Sasse said that he had worked hard to develop a good relationship with Trump and then touted areas where “the president has now adopted traditionally Republican positions that he used to reject, for the majority of his life, when he was funding Democratic candidates.” In particular, Sasse said that Trump has nominated very good judges.

“There are a lot of places where he and I differ as well,” Sasse continued, “And these aren’t mere policy issues, and I’m not at all apologetic for having fought for my values against his in places where I think his are deficient, not just for a Republican but for an American.”

“The way he kisses dictator’s butts, the way he ignores that the Uighurs are in literal concentration camps in Xinjiang right now, he hasn’t lifted a finger on behalf of the Hong Kongers,” Sasse went on. “I mean he and I have a very different foreign policy. It isn’t just that he fails to lead our allies, it’s that the United States now regularly sells out our allies under his leadership. The way he treats women and spends like a drunken sailor. I criticized President Obama for that kind of spending, I criticize President Trump for it as well.”

Shifting to the president’s personal traits, Sasse said, “He mocks evangelicals behind closed doors. His family has treated the presidency like a business opportunity. He has flirted with white supremacists.”

Sasse then addressed Trump’s response to the Coronavirus pandemic. “At the beginning of the COVID crisis, he refused to treat it seriously,” Sasse charged. “For months, he treated it like a newscycle by newscycle PR crisis rather than a multi-year public health challenge, which is what it is.”

“Now, in his partial defense here, I think that lots of the news media has pretended that COVID is literally the first public health crisis ever and somehow it’s Donald Trump’s fault, that’s not true,” he qualified, “But the reality is that he careened from curb to curb. First, he ignored COVID and then he went into full economic shutdown mode. He was the one who said that 10 to 14 days of shutdown would fix this, and that was always wrong.”

Sasse also said that he thought Trump would ultimately drive the country further to the left. President Trump erred when he mistook an electoral fluke for a broad popular mandate.

“I think folks have regularly misunderstood the meaning of 2016,” Sasse said. “Donald Trump didn’t win the presidency because America actually wants more reality tv around the clock…. I think the overwhelming reason that Trump won in 2016 was because Hillary Clinton was literally the most unpopular candidate in the history of polling.”

“It has always been imprudent for our party to try to tie itself to a Trumpian brand and that’s what I’ve been worried about for five years,” Sasse said.

Sasse fretted, “I’m worried that if President Trump loses, which looks likely, that he’s going to take the Senate down with him,” adding that he is concerned about the possible loss of the filibuster and its effect on religious liberty and free speech.”

“I’m looking at the possibility of a Republican bloodbath in the Senate and that’s why I’ve never been on the Trump train,” Sasse said.

Sasse takes a long view, speculating that court-packing could lead to “dozens of people on the Supreme Court,” that our allies in the Pacific will side with China “because Trump’s isolationism is so weak” that our allies doubt us, that “young people [will] become permanent Democrats because they’ve just been repulsed by the obsessive of our politics,” and that women will leave the Republican Party permanently.

“What the heck were any of us thinking that selling a tv-obsessed narcissistic individual to the American people was a good idea?” Sasse asked rhetorically. “It was not a good idea.”

Can I get an amen?

Sasse makes many of the same points that I have made over the past five years. That includes earlier this week when I decided to support Joe Biden for president and Republican candidates for Congress. What Sasse says is what many prominent Republicans must have known all along. I am glad to hear Senator Sasse speaking out about Donald Trump’s flaws, but, for this election, it is too little too late. The Republicans are about to lose both the White House and the Senate to a blue tsunami.

I sympathize with Sasse’s fears about Democratic control of the presidency and both houses of Congress, but the time to sound a warning against Donald Trump was years ago, not two weeks before the election. If more Republicans had spoken out against Trump’s excesses, if they had done their constitutional duty and removed him from office last January, then we would be looking at a completely different campaign.

If Donald Trump was not at the top of the Republican ticket, Mike Pence would not be making inane comments and retweeting conspiracy theories. A Pence-Biden debate would have had a completely different outcome than the disastrous Trump-Biden debate. Republican incumbents in Congress would not be shackled to a sinking ship. If Mike Pence was the nominee, I and many other disaffected conservatives would have voted Republican rather than Democrat or third party.

Whose fault is the looming Republican electoral disaster? Ultimately, it is Donald Trump’s fault, but Republicans in Congress also deserve a large share of the blame. The GOP promised to hold Trump’s feet to the fire and then proceeded to let him run amok, circling their wagons to protect him from accountability. The Republican Party even protected Trump from primary challenges by canceling many state primaries, ensuring that their deeply flawed candidate would be the standard bearer, no matter how unpopular he was.

In 2016, the Republican embrace of Trump was a matter of necessity to defeat Hillary Clinton. In 2020, the party had a choice and knowingly, purposely, eagerly hitched itself to the man who half the country wanted removed from office only nine months ago. A man who 52 percent of voters said they would never vote for even before the pandemic.

Ben Sasse’s criticism of Trump is honest and refreshing, but it comes too late. The Republican Party is about to face losses of historic proportions because Republican voters have lived in a pro-Trump bubble for the past four years and been in denial about Trump’s widespread unpopularity, aided by congressional Republicans and pro-Republican pundits on television and radio.

If more Republicans had demonstrated the moral courage of Democrats who united to stand against Bernie Sanders, things might have been different, but, sadly, we will never know. America and the Republican Party are about to pay the price for the Republican failure to stand up for the principles that they professed before Trump came down the escalator.

Originally published on The First TV

Friday, October 4, 2019

Third Republican Senator Breaks With Trump On Whistleblower


For four years now, it has been an open question of what it would take to get Republican congressmen to break with Donald Trump. As the whistleblower scandal widens, it appears that we may be reaching a point of enough-is-enough. So far, at least three Republican senators have broken with the party to criticize President Trump for requesting that Ukraine aid his personal attorney in investigating Joe and Hunter Biden.

The first Republican senator to speak out against the president’s actions was Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), a frequent Trump critic. Back in September, Sasse said that the whistleblower allegations contained “real troubling things.” Sasse added, “Republicans ought not just circle the wagons” to protect Trump.”

Earlier this week, Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), joined Sasse in breaking with the Administration. In particular, Grassley was at odds with Republican attacks on the credibility of the whistleblower based on the belief that the complaint was based on secondhand information.

“This person appears to have followed the whistleblower protection laws and ought to be heard out and protected. We should always work to respect whistleblowers,” Grassley said in Politico. “Complaints based on second-hand information should not be rejected out of hand, but they do require additional leg work to get at the facts and evaluate the claim’s credibility.”

Now, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) is also breaking ranks. “Whistleblowers should be protected," Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa told a constituent at a town hall yesterday. "I stand with Chuck Grassley on this. We have laws in place."

NBC News reported that the constituent also asked, “Where is the line [that Trump would have to cross to lose Republican support]?”

"You didn't pledge an oath to the president, you pledged it to our country, you pledged it to our Constitution. When are you guys going to start standing up and actually be there for us?" the constituent asked.

Ernst answered, “The president is going to say what the president is going to do. It's up to us as members of the Congress to continue working with our allies making sure that we remain strong in a face of adversity."

A lot of Americans would like to know just what it will take to break the bond between Trump and the GOP. This is not the first time that Republican officials have criticized the president’s actions. Some Republicans have criticized the president on issues such as the firing of James Comey, interference in the Russia investigation, and the trade war. However, few, if any, have gone so far as to retract endorsements of the president’s re-election campaign.

It is beginning to look like the 2020 campaign may look a lot like a mirror image of 2016. In the last election, Hillary Clinton was damaged by the constant drip of damaging information from her email scandal and WikiLeaks dumps of stolen DNC emails. This time around, it appears that the drip of damaging information may be aimed at Donald Trump.  

At this point, it appears that the whistleblower scandal will continue to unfold in a slow dribble of embarrassing and possibly incriminating leaks about Donald Trump. With 13 months left to go before the election, Republicans have time to rally behind an alternative candidate, but time is running out. If the leaks are coordinated, as it appears that they are, Democrats may stage the scandal so that the most embarrassing and damaging information comes out after Mr. Trump has clinched the Republican nomination next year, leaving Republicans with both a mortally damaged candidate and an economy that is slowing due to the trade war. 

While most Republicans are still standing by the president at this point, the excuse that “this is just Trump being Trump” only goes so far. If continued revelations of poor judgment and possible criminal wrongdoing, together with a slowing economy, continue to dog Trump to the point where his campaign appears to be beyond salvaging, Republicans may finally start to may a clean break with the president. By then, however, it may be too late for 2020.

Originally published on The Resurgent

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Ben Sasse Won't Support Replacing Sessions


President Trump has had a difficult week. There has been bad legal news on several fronts and the president responded as he often does. In an interview with Fox News, Trump denied Russian collusion and blasted Attorney General Jeff Sessions for his disloyalty in recusing himself from the Russia investigation.

One of Trump’s chief complaints is that Sessions took the job of attorney general without telling Trump in advance that he would recuse himself. In reality, Sessions had no reason to recuse himself until after he was sworn in on Feb. 8, 2017. A few weeks after he took office, it was revealed that Sessions had met with Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak during the 2016 campaign despite stating during his confirmation hearings that he had not had contact with Russians in that time.  After the revelation, Sessions recused himself on March 2 citing Justice Department regulations that “no DOJ employee may participate in a criminal investigation or prosecution if he has a personal or political relationship with any person or organization substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecution, or who would be directly affected by the outcome.”

The renewed spat between the president and the attorney general has rekindled speculation that Trump may fire Sessions. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) speculated that the president is “very likely” to dismiss Sessions after the midterm elections. Now Ben Sasse and other Republican senators are warning the president against removing the attorney general.

“I find it really difficult to envision any circumstance where I would vote to confirm a successor to Jeff Sessions if he is fired because he's executing his job, rather than choosing to act as a partisan hack," Sasse (R-Neb.) said on the Senate floor.

“The attorney general of the United States should not be fired for acting honorably and for being faithful to the rule of law,” he added.

“It would be a very, very, very bad idea to fire the attorney general because he's not executing his job as a political hack,” Sasse said. “That is not the job of the attorney general. The attorney general's job is to be faithful to the Constitution and to the rule of law.”

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) seemed to agree with Sasse, telling reporters that she didn’t “see the president being able to get someone else confirmed” if Sessions was removed.

Meanwhile, President Trump left no doubt what he wants with a pair of early morning tweets, in which he responded to Sessions’ statement that the “Department of Justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations.”

“Jeff, this is GREAT, what everyone wants,” the president tweeted, before adding unironically, “So look into all of the corruption on the ‘other side’ including deleted Emails, Comey lies & leaks, Mueller conflicts, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, FISA abuse, Christopher Steele & his phony and corrupt Dossier, the Clinton Foundation, illegal surveillance of Trump Campaign, Russian collusion by Dems - and so much more.”

At this point, President Trump is stuck with Sessions. The attorney general seems to have no plans to leave his post even after more than a year of withering criticism and attacks from the president. If Trump did fire Sessions, there would be little time to pick and confirm a new nominee before the new Congress is seated next year. In any case, the growing revolt from Republicans in the Senate makes it doubtful that a nominee more friendly to Trump could be appointed. In the absence of a new attorney general, control of the Department of Justice would fall to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who is not exactly a Trump favorite either. It’s possible that election results might make firing Sessions after the election even more problematic.

Donald Trump picked Jeff Sessions to head the Department of Justice. Sessions is doing his job with integrity and without regard for partisanship. This is obviously what upsets the president since he wants someone who can steer the Russia investigation away from his administration and focus the efforts of the DOJ onto his political enemies. Nevertheless, it seems unlikely that Trump will be able to rid himself of Sessions before his term ends in 2021.

Originally published on The Resurgent

Monday, July 16, 2018

Ben Sasse Tweets About Putin

The big item on the agenda for today is the face-to-face meeting between Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The meeting in Helsinki, Finland comes three days after Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers in connection with cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee and the US election infrastructure in 2016.

In advance of the meeting, polling shows that Russia and Putin have become more popular in the US. Since the 2016, despite revelations about Russian cyberattacks, there has been a “reset” of opinions about the country, primarily among Republicans. Gallup recently found that the share of Republicans who view Moscow as an ally has doubled since Donald Trump took office. Perhaps that is why Nebraska Republican Ben Sasse felt compelled to take to Twitter to educate the public about Mr. Putin.

Sasse has recently reappeared on Twitter after a self-imposed hiatus that has lasted most of this year. The Trump-sized tweetstorm on the senator’s popular Twitter account began with the questions, “Exactly who is Vladimir Putin, the Russian leader our president is about to meet with in Helsinki? And what does he want?”

“It’s a complicated question. But here’s what we do know,” Sasse continued.

“Putin is a murderer. He has ordered the assassinations of political adversaries and used outlawed chemical weapons to do it.  He oversees Russian military units that shot down Malaysian flight 17 and murdered almost 300 civilians.

“Putin is a crook and a liar.  He has broken almost every agreement he has signed with the United States, including on Syria and Ukraine. He has become one of the world's richest men through embezzlement and stealing from his own people.

“Putin is an enemy of America. He sees us as his main enemy and is engaged in ongoing attacks on our nation through information warfare and hacking our infrastructure.  It’s not just that he messed with our election in 2016; he attacks us regularly, and will again in 2018.

“Remember, Putin ordered the influence operations that have been exposed in the most recent indictments, did not hesitate to invade Ukraine and Georgia, organized a coup in Montenegro, funded xenophobic political parties across Europe, and crippled Estonia with cyberattacks.

“No matter how much Putin flatters the President, he is a KGB thug who jails political opponents, encourages/orders the murder of Russian dissidents and defectors at home and abroad, and who directs a military that bombs women, children, and the injured in hospitals in Syria.”

The Sasse tweetstorm abated with advice for President Trump. “I don't think President Trump should be dignifying Putin with this meeting,” Sasse said. “When Reagan met with Gorbachev, he did so from a position of strength & moral clarity about the evil empire that the Soviet Union was, and w/ a clear purpose to end the Soviet Union's threat to the US.”

“President Trump should have only one message for Putin tomorrow,” Sasse concluded. “Quit messing with America.”

But Sasse wasn’t completely finished yet. President Trump, who has yet to condemn the Russian cyberattacks on the US addressed in the indictment, tweeted this morning, it was to attack the “Rigged Witch Hunt” rather than the Russian assault on the foundation of American democracy.

“Our relationship with Russia has NEVER been worse thanks to many years of U.S. foolishness and stupidity and now, the Rigged Witch Hunt!” the president tweeted before his historic closed-door meeting with the neo-Soviet ruler.

“A better thing, Mr. President, would be to declare: ‘Russia is the enemy of America and our allies, and we will expose and respond to their continued cyber-attacks against our nation,’” Sasse replied.

Welcome back to Twitter, Sen. Sasse. We have missed your outspokenness and honesty over the past few months.

Originally published on The Resurgent

Thursday, March 1, 2018

Sasse Smacks Trump On Gun Control

President Trump continued his surprisingly strong attack on Second Amendment rights and the National Rifle Association yesterday in a joint meeting on gun control with Democrats at the White House. At one point, the president even endorsed the idea of confiscating guns from potential criminals first and worrying about due process later.

“I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida ... to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said in an exchange reported by The Hill. “Take the guns first, go through due process second.”

Vice President Pence quickly corrected the president, saying, “Allow due process so no one’s rights are trampled, but the ability to go to court, obtain an order and then collect not only the firearms but any weapons.”

“Or, Mike, take the firearms first, and then go to court.” Trump responded.

In the televised meeting, President Trump also expressed support for a number of other gun control ideas from expanding background checks to restricting sales to people younger than 21. Most surprisingly, Trump also signaled support for Sen. Dianne Feinstein's (D-Cal.) bill which would revive the “assault weapons” ban from the 1990s.

The president also cut off at the knees a Republican proposal to enact national reciprocity for concealed carry permits. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), a victim of last year's congressional softball shooting, had proposed the bill that would allow gun owners to carry their weapons across state lines.


“You’ll never get this passed if you add concealed carry to this,” Trump said.

Conservatives would be apoplectic if Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton had made Trump's comments. In fact, conservatives would be ready to take up arms – literally – if anyone other than Trump had made the statements. However, the response from the right was muted with many conservatives on social media standing by the president.

Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) was one of the few Republicans to speak out strongly against the president's comments. In the past, Sasse has been a staunch conservative critic of Mr. Trump, but in recent months he has been quiet. That changed yesterday with a strong statement.

“Strong leaders don't automatically agree with the last thing that was said to them,” Sasse said in a brief statement quoted by the Washington Examiner. “We have the Second Amendment and due process of law for a reason. We're not ditching any Constitutional protections simply because the last person the President talked to today doesn’t like them.”

Sasse's statement was a breath of fresh air in the overheated gun control debate. But where are the rest of the of the pro-Second Amendment congressmen that Republicans thought they sent to Washington?


Originally published on The Resurgent

Thursday, October 12, 2017

Sasse Responds To Trump's Attacks On First Amendment

Ben Sasse’s last name has a silent “e,” but Twitter users can be forgiven for thinking the Nebraska Republican’s name is pronounced “sassy.” The adjective is an accurate description of the Sasse on the popular social media platform. Sasse most recently turned his sharp retorts toward President Trump after the president launched into what can only be described as a series of attacks on the First Amendment freedom of the press.

While attacking “fake news” has proven a popular shtick for the president, he reached a new level on Tuesday with a tweet that suggested that NBC News’ license should be “challenged” on the basis of their report that Trump had said that he wanted to increase the US nuclear weapons arsenal by a factor of 10 in a July meeting. The meeting prompted Secretary of State Tillerson to allegedly call the president a “f---ing moron.”

On a day when the sitting president of the United States directly attacked the First Amendment, the response from Republican officials was underwhelming. While Republicans lined up to denounce NFL players kneeling during the National Anthem, it was extremely difficult to find anyone in the GOP who was willing to go on record criticizing Trump’s statements. A piece in The Hill describing the backlash fails to cite a single sitting Republican. In fact, there seemed to be only one Republican responding to the president’s shocking remarks, the sassy Sasse.

It has only been a few weeks since Sasse wowed the non-alternative-right with his Twitter takedown of neo-Nazi Richard Spencer. The viral series of tweets brought adulation from traditional conservatives who felt left behind by the new Republican Party and the lack of condemnation for race-baiters like Spencer, who was an organizer of the riotous Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. Given his history of using Twitter to communicate a strong conservative and pro-freedom message effectively, it should be no surprise that Sasse was the one to put the president’s remarks into constitutional perspective.

“Mr. President,” Sasse tweeted, “Are you recanting of the Oath you took on Jan. 20 to preserve, protect, and defend the 1st Amendment?”

[Mic drop.]

The tweet also contained a somewhat longer statement released by Senator Sasse. The full statement reads, “Mr. President: Words spoken by the President of the United States matter. Are you tonight recanting of the oath you took on January 20th to preserve, protect and defend the First Amendment?”

Trump did not respond directly to Sasse, but later in the day, the president doubled down on his attack on the freedom of the press, saying in a White House press conference, “It's frankly disgusting the way the press is able to write whatever they want to write, and people should look into it.”

Another tweet from the president on Tuesday night was even more specific. “Network news has become so partisan, distorted and fake that licenses must be challenged and, if appropriate, revoked. Not fair to public!” the man sworn to defend the Constitution said.

As a refresher, the First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press….” The Bill of Rights makes no exception for “fake news,” biased reporting or even outright lies.

FCC rules do “prohibit holders of broadcast licenses from broadcasting false information concerning a crime or a catastrophe if the licensee knows the information is false; and the licensee knows beforehand that broadcasting the information will cause substantial ‘public harm.’” Stories critical of President Trump would not fall under this category.


As the president becomes increasingly bold in his attacks on the First Amendment, the big question for conservatives is where the other defenders of the Constitution are. The silence from other Republicans is deafening. 

Originally published on The Resurgent

Friday, September 29, 2017

Ben Sasse Destroys Neo-Nazi Richard Spencer On Twitter

From time to time, there is a Twitter takedown that is worth repeating and sharing with the rest of the world. When the takedown in question is the utter rhetorical annihilation of an alt-right icon like Richard Spencer, the thrashing is even more delicious.

Richard Spencer, the recipient of the beat-down, is a white supremacist and one of the organizers of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va. that turned into a full-blown riot in August. Spencer was previously seen a few weeks after the 2016 election leading alt-right supporters in a Nazi salute and chanting, “Hail Trump! Hail our people! Hail victory!” Suffice it to say that Richard Spencer is far out of the conservative mainstream.

In the other corner is Ben Sasse, the junior Republican senator from Nebraska. In three years in the Senate, Sasse has quickly emerged as a leading conservative thinker and outspoken defender of freedom and the Constitution.


The brouhaha started when Spencer called out “goober conservatives” on Twitter in a tweet that defended Russia from charges that it meddled in the 2016 campaign. So, sit back, make some popcorn, and enjoy Ben Sasse’s eloquent and impassioned response. 

In the minds of goober conservatives, the Russians are to blame for racial divisions. https://t.co/CzpGfL6u4M
— Richard ☝🏻Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) September 28, 2017
No one loves American-vs-American fighting more than Putin. His intel agencies stoke both sides of every divide.https://t.co/H6BwjHzokH
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
2/
Don’t get me wrong: we’ll always have brown-shirt-pajama-boy Nazis like you & your lonely pals stoking division. But here’s America 101: https://t.co/SboVZmOuu2
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
3/
You don’t get America. You said: “You do not have some human right, some abstract thing given to you by God or something like that.” https://t.co/ScXDGFcbGp
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
4/
Actually, that's exactly what America declares we do have: People are the image-bearers of God, created with dignity& inalienable rights. https://t.co/d4orBrHJMw
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
5/
Sadly, you don't understand human dignity. A person's skin, ancestry, and bank balance have nothing to do with their intrinsic value. https://t.co/5JsyVAKQRL
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
6/
This declaration of universal dignity is what America is about. Madison called our Constitution "the greatest reflection on human nature" https://t.co/NQluVs1KvA
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
7/
You talk about culture but don't know squat about western heritage--which sees people not as tribes but as individuals of limitless worth https://t.co/VKNvDUXLtT
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
8/
The celebration of universal dignity IS our culture, & it rejects your "white culture" crybaby politics. It rejects all identity politics https://t.co/Adlj9AvNPR
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
9/
Sometime after moving back into your parents' basement, you knock-off Nazis fell in love with reheated 20th century will-to-power garbage https://t.co/XDTeATVGSe
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
10/
Your "ideas" aren't just hateful, un-American poison--they're also just so dang boring. The future doesn't belong to your stupid memes. https://t.co/bNHSlf1uOx
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017
11/11
Get a real job, Clown. Find an actual neighbor to serve. You'll be happier.
Have a nice day. https://t.co/ToREd7VwDM
— Ben Sasse (@BenSasse) September 28, 2017


Sasse understands what the protesters on the left and the alt-right do not. That the best answer to offensive and radical speech is more speech. Good ideas, not violent force, should be used to destroy bad ideas. 

Originally Published On The Resurgent

Friday, June 30, 2017

Sasse, Paul, and Trump Call For Obamacare Repeal Instead of Reform

In statements echoed by President Trump on Twitter, two prominent Republican senators have called for the GOP to skip the health care overhaul and focus on simple repeal of Obamacare if Republican Senate leadership cannot find 50 votes to move the current health care reform bill forward. Earlier this week, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced that a vote on the health care bill would be delayed until after the July 4 recess.

In a letter to the White House quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) said, “On the current path it looks like Republicans will either fail to pass any meaningful bill at all, or will instead pass a bill that looks to prop up many of the crumbling Obama care structures.”

“We must keep our word,” Sasse continued. “Therefore, if on July 10 we don’t have agreement on a combined repeal and replace plan, we should immediately vote again on... the December 2015 Obamacare repeal legislation that the Congress passed but President Obama vetoed.”

Within a few minutes of Sen. Sasse’s discussion of re-introducing the 2015 bill, HR 3762, President Trump tweeted support for the idea. “If Republican Senators are unable to pass what they are working on now, they should immediately REPEAL, and then REPLACE at a later date!” Trump said on Twitter.


Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) also endorsed the idea. “I have spoken to @realDonaldTrump & Senate leadership about this and agree. Let's keep our word to repeal then work on replacing right away,” Paul tweeted.


The 2015 bill in question, HR 3762, was not technically a full repeal of Obamacare either since it also amended the Affordable Care Act rather than repealing it outright. A full repeal would require 60 votes for cloture in the Senate, which is far out of reach. The bill passed the Senate in a largely party line vote on December 3, 2015 by a 52-47 margin.

Sasse has not suggested a strategy for passing a 2017 version of the bill. The problem for Republicans on passage of the current health care reform bill is that nine Republican senators are reportedly in opposition to the bill. Assuming no Democrats cross the aisle, Republicans could lose no more than two senators and still be able to pass the bill.

The current Republican opposition to the health care reform is from both the center and the right wings of the GOP. Moderate Republicans such as Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) argue that the bill hurts too many people on Medicaid in their states while conservatives such as Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) say that the bill does not go far enough in reforming Obamacare. With eroding support from both ends of Republican political spectrum, the current bill has little chance of passage.

Sasse’s plan to revive the 2015 bill is a partial answer in that it should bring the conservatives back on board. The problem is that Republicans would still need moderate votes to move the bill forward.

When the bill originally passed in 2015, Republicans held two more seats in the Senate than they do today. Back then, two Republicans crossed party lines to vote against the bill: Susan Collins and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.). Kirk lost his seat to Democrat Tammy Duckworth in 2016, but Collins is still in the Senate and could be counted on to vote against the bill once again. That leaves Republicans with a one vote margin.

Earlier this year, The Resurgent reported that four Republican senators who had voted for the 2015 bill would refuse to vote for a bill that did not allow a slow phase out of the Obamacare Medicaid expansion. If Shelly Moore-Capito (R-W.V.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), Corey Gardner (R-Col.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) stick to their pledge, it would doom Sasse’s plan.

Still, a deficit of five votes is a more surmountable obstacle than the deficit of nine votes that the GOP currently faces. It is possible that pressure could be brought to bear on the four senators who previously voted for the bill that would keep them in the “yes” column.

An additional risk would be with the reform that still must come after the passage of the near-repeal. Democrats might be persuaded to join the reform effort if most of Obamacare was gutted, but they might also adopt a you-break-it-you-bought-it policy that would allow them to campaign against the Republican-created chaos in the health care markets in 2018 and beyond. Given recent Democrat obstructionism, there is little doubt which course they would take.


Still, as the Republican health care reform seems increasingly dead in the water, Sasse’s plan, long shot that it is, may be the only viable option to keep the GOP promise to repeal and replace Obamacare. 

Originally published on The Resurgent