Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Is abortion literally murder?

 Rhetorically speaking, abortion has been called murder for a long time. Now, that assertion may be tested in court. 

A new case to watch involves a woman from Kingsland, Georgia who knowingly took pills to abort her unborn baby. Fox 5 Atlanta reports that Alexia Zantail Moore, a 31-year old woman, went into an emergency room on December 30, 2025 complaining of abdominal pains. Moore, who was about 22 weeks pregnant, told doctors that she had taken 8 misoprostol pills, a drug that is used to induce abortion, and the opioid oxycodone.

Moore delivered her baby, which was born with a heartbeat and lived for about an hour. The infant tested positive for oxycodone, but misoprostol does not show up on toxicology reports. Moore said that she got the misoprostol from a group called Access Aid and the oxycodone from a family member.

Moore reportedly told an investigator, "I know my infant is suffering, because I am the one who did the abortion. I want her to die."

Photo credit: Tingey Injury Law Firm/Unsplash.com

Now, Moore is facing charges of murder in the death of her baby girl. Moore was arrested in early March and detained in the Camden County jail. Per the arrest warrant, she “unlawfully and with malice aforethought, caused the death of baby girl Moore, a human being who was born alive and survived for one hour. Under Georgia law, the victim became a person at the moment of live birth.”

Under Georgia law, abortion is illegal after a baby’s heartbeat is detected in most cases. This usually occurs at about six weeks. Moore allegedly told the investigator that she believed that she was at about 14 weeks, but she is not being charged under Georgia’s heartbeat law.

Georgia law also holds that unborn babies are considered legal persons. It is the second law, the personhood law, that is the basis for Moore’s murder charge. Once the baby was born alive, it became a legal person, and in the investigator’s view, Moore was responsible for the baby’s murder. 

It’s easy to see Moore as a villain in the case, based on what she told the investigator, but looking deeper, she is also a tragic figure. 19th News gives more background about the accused murderer, an army veteran and the mother of two other children, ages six and nine. Moore was reportedly discharged from the army with 100 percent disability due to post-traumatic stress disorder. 

Edith Moore, the mother of the accused and a local pastor, said of her daughter, “As a mother, and me talking as a grandma, she’s an excellent mother. I believe her children are her life. She has been a good provider for her children.”

A friend denied that Moore took abortion pills, saying, “I remember her calling me, freaking out. She was bawling her eyes out. She said she didn’t know what to do.“

She continued, “‘If worse comes to worst,’ I said, ‘If you 100 percent go through with having the baby, and if you don’t want it, you can always give it to me, and you know, it’ll be taken care of.’”

I am opposed to abortion, but looking deeper at this case shows that the issue isn’t always black and white. I mourn for the loss of Moore’s baby girl, but my heart also breaks for Moore herself, an apparent single mom who is obviously struggling to raise her existing children, with her mental health, and likely with finances as well. 

As I’ve written in the past, if pro-lifers really want to reduce abortion, they should focus on reducing demand for abortion, rather than just passing bans. Alexia Moore may be a good example of this. If mental healthcare and assistance in raising and paying for children were more readily available, not to mention low-cost contraceptives, Moore might not have felt the need to abort her baby. 

The Camden County DA has reportedly not decided whether to take her case to the grand jury to seek an indictment, but I don’t see that the State of Georgia benefits by paying to keep Alexia Moore in jail alongside violent criminals and drug dealers in the meantime. Her two boys don’t benefit from having their mom incarcerated either. 

Maybe this is why abortion bans don’t usually hold mothers criminally liable for the abortions of their babies. Usually, the focus is on prosecuting abortion providers rather than abortion patients. Often, the women are just as much victims as the babies.

But in Moore’s case, the abortion was self-induced. There was no abortion provider. Just an anonymous pharmacist who provided abortion pills (if Moore actually took abortion pills).

With a number of new abortion bans and personhood laws around the country since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision, if Camden County decides to prosecute Moore, it is likely to become a landmark legal case. However, my money would be on the county dropping the charges. There would be no winners in a case like this, and I’m skeptical that many DAs would want to go down in history as the first prosecutor to take such a dubious and tragic case to court. 

Thanks for reading The Racket News ™! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

ICE AIRPORT UPDATE Yesterday, I referenced an incident with ICE at the San Francisco airport in which an alleged US citizen was violently detained in front of her daughter. The government says that the pair were being deported to Guatemala when they tried to flee.


From the Racket News

Airplanes and Iran

The big news of the morning is a collision between an Air Canada Jazz CRJ airliner and airport emergency vehicles crossing a runway at New York’s La Guardia International AirPort. The two pilots of the CRJ were killed, and several others were injured. 

The ATC audio recording (a video has also surfaced) shows that the controller cleared the emergency vehicles across the runway where the CRJ was landing, but the big question is why. The accident occurred at 11:47 pm, and air traffic control facilities are often understaffed at night. This is speculation at this point, but l’ll be interested to see whether controller workload played a role. 

Screenshot of the CRJ runway collision from OSINTDefender

Share

You might wonder why the airplane didn’t go around or the ground vehicles didn’t swerve out of the way. There are a lot of multicolored lights around a runway at a big airport, so the lights of the emergency vehicles and the airplane probably blended in. They may not have seen each other until it was too late. Further, the CRJ was reportedly traveling at about 100 mph. This would be too slow to fly and too fast to stop or take evasive action.

At towered airports, pilots and ground vehicles are dependent on ATC to coordinate traffic movements. Looking before you cross a runway is always a good safety practice, but this seems a clear case of human error on the part of the controller.

Speaking of aviation, if you have airline tickets this week, I’d recommend that you cancel the flight and drive. The DHS funding shutdown has resulted in extremely long security lines at airports around the country. Trump has ordered ICE in to assist TSA in their airport security duties even though ICE agents are not trained for such work.

American voters might want to ask themselves why ICE is the only DHS agency that is funded and why it is funded so well that it can do TSA’s job as well as its own. The answer in part is that Republicans massively overfunded ICE in Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill with a multiyear appropriation. Why they threw so much money at ICE and insulated it from the normal appropriations process is something that Republicans need to answer, along with why they are going to such lengths to prevent ICE from being subject to the same rules as other law enforcement agencies.

Republicans online have been busy blaming Democrats for the long TSA lines, but in reality, Republicans have been quietly killing partial funding bills. On Monday morning, news broke that congressional Democrats and Republicans had reached a deal to end the shutdown, but Trump would not agree to the compromise. This means that the shortage of transportation security workers during a war with a terrorist nation will continue, along with a passenger inconvenience of YUGE proportions. 

predicted online that putting ICE officers in contact with the public at airports would be a disaster that made the agency even less popular. That seems to be quickly coming true as social media reports trickle in of ICE agents milling around aimlessly, along with the violent arrest of a reported US citizen mother who was traveling with her daughter (#GOVT GONE WILD). Trump has acknowledged that ICE will be conducting immigration arrests at airports, so that’s something else travelers have to look forward to. 

Along the same lines, I saw a marked ICE vehicle at a major Florida airport this morning. This was the first time in my life that I have seen any ICE vehicle, much less inside the secure area of an airport. I am only speculating, but they seemed to be acting like Customs officers, who are a frequent sight on airport ramps.

Finally, Trump announced that he had been conducting talks with Iran and would suspend a threatened bombing campaign against Iranian power plants. Iran has denied that talks were taking place, but the buried lede is that Trump is more willing to negotiate with terrorists than Democrats.


From the Racket News

Friday, March 20, 2026

Seven percent

 It looks as if American ground troops will be committed in Iran within the next week or so. As I described last week, a Marine expeditionary force is being moved from Okinawa to the Persian Gulf, and Senator Lindsey Graham has indicated that the target is Kharg Island, an Iranian oil facility at the opposite end of the Persian Gulf from the Strait of Hormuz. 

Graham may be engaging in a strategic deception because, to get to Kharg Island, the Marines would have to run the gauntlet of the Strait of Hormuz with its nearby Iranian missile batteries and drone sites. The alternatives would be either to disembark the Marines and move them by air to Kharg Island, in which case the question is why use the Marines at all, or have the amphibious fighters assault the Iranian mainland and islands adjacent to the choke point of the strait. This would make more strategic sense when it comes to reopening shipping lanes, and if I can figure this out, the Iranians can too. 

Image by ChatGPT

Share

The Iranians can also figure something else out: The war is not popular, either at home or abroad (except maybe among Iranian dissidents and neocons). If you only inhabit Republican and MAGA internet circles, this might come as news. 

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that overall support for the war is hovering at about 40 percent, but only seven percent support large-scale ground operations in Iran. An additional 34 percent would support limited operations by Special Forces, but even the combined figures are less than 55 percent who oppose all use of ground troops. 

Seven percent. 

It’s hard to find the country united on any issue enough to render single-digit polling, but Trump has done it. Even Republican support for a ground invasion is only at 14 percent, although a 63-percent majority of Republicans supports Special Forces raids. 

By way of comparison, by 1973, the year that the US combat troops were withdrawn from Vietnam, public support for that war was at 29 percent. Yes, you read that right. The most unpopular war in American history was more than three times as popular as the idea of invading Iran. 

But the real kicker is that 65 percent of Americans think Trump is going to commit ground troops anyway. 

Think about that for a second. Two-thirds of Americans think that the president is going to follow a course opposed by more than 90 percent of the voters. That indicates an electorate that sees the president as out of touch and unresponsive. 

My first instinct is that launching a ground war is political suicide when it comes to the midterms. Of course, Donald Trump is constitutionally term-limited despite talk of a third term, but I think someone as vain as he is cares about his legacy. 

Following quickly on that thought is the fact that American service members are likely to bear the brunt of public dislike for the war. It is not fair to America’s fighters to dump them into a situation that is not only almost universally unpopular, but may not be strategically winnable. 

I would not be surprised if an invasion didn’t initially become somewhat more popular with a rally-around-the-flag (or more accurately, rally-around-Trump) effect, but a long-term war with such low support cannot be successful in a democracy. Elective wars should not be started without popular support, a good reason, a clear objective, and good chance of success. 

If Donald Trump sends American ground troops into Iran, he is not only gambling with their lives (and possibly, as in Afghanistan, the lives of soldiers yet unborn), he is gambling with his legacy. If he involves the US in yet another Middle East quagmire, his memory will be cursed by future generations. 

Trump is also gambling with America’s financial future. The Administration is already asking for $200 billion in new spending to fight a war that has not been authorized by Congress. This as the national debt has just added $1 trillion in five months, almost doubling since Trump vowed to erase it in 2017. The deficit hawks have been replaced by Iran hawks. 

Trump’s original error was going to war without first building support of either the American public or our allies, but he has spent the past year disregarding the opinions of both when not actively working to alienate them. Now the president is staking everything on a Hail Mary to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and win the war. 

It is a desperate strategy that is more likely to embroil the US in another generational quagmire that will strain the US and world economies while giving China an opportunity to expand, not to mention killing and maiming untold numbers on both sides. If Republicans allow Trump to follow this destructive course with seven percent of the country behind him, they deserve to be cast into the political wilderness for the foreseeable future.

Thanks for reading The Racket News ™! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

F-35 DAMAGED by apparent enemy fire over Iran. The pilot landed safely, but if Iran can hit the stealthy fighters, it raises the risks of attacking and makes the use of drones and standoff missiles more necessary.


From the Racket News