Showing posts with label supply. Show all posts
Showing posts with label supply. Show all posts

Thursday, April 9, 2020

Federal Medical Stockpile Is Running Out

From the beginning of the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States, a buzzword has been “flatten the curve.” With no treatment and no vaccine, the plan was to slow the rate of infection to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed with cases of COVID-19. The wisdom of that strategy is now being illustrated by the fact that the strategic federal reserve of medical supplies is dwindling after an outbreak that is only six weeks old.
Axios reports that 90 percent of the federal stockpile will be deployed to the states while 10 percent will be held in reserve “for critical needs of frontline healthcare workers serving in federal response efforts” per Health and Human Services spokesman Katie McKeogh. The government has already shipped out more than 11 million N95 masks and 7,000 ventilators, but the remaining contents of the stockpile is not enough to meet current requests from the states, many of which are expecting surges in hospital demand in coming weeks.
“The stockpile was designed to respond to a handful of cities. It was never built or designed to fight a 50-state pandemic,” an anonymous Homeland Security official told the Washington Post last week. “This is not only a U.S. government problem. The supply chain for PPE worldwide has broken down, and there is a lot of price-gouging happening.”
The government is attempting to refill the stockpile with items produced under the Defense Production Act. President Trump invoked the Act back on March 18 but the first contracts for ventilators were only signed yesterday. Phillips will produce 2,500 ventilators by the end of May and 43,000 by the end of the year while GM will deliver 6,132 ventilators by June 1 and 30,000 by the end of August.  The Trump Adminstration canceled a pending ventilator contract with GM back on March 26 citing cost concerns.
The stockpile shortage may also play into reports that the federal government is seizing medical supplies from hospitals and state agencies. The Los Angeles Times reported on Monday that hospitals in seven states reported that FEMA had commandeered shipments of medical supplies that they had ordered. Spokesmen for the hospitals said that the government had not given them any guidance about how to access the supplies that they had requested and there was no information about how the government intended to distribute the seized shipments. Presumably, the supplies are being fed into the national stockpile but that has not been confirmed.
President Trump has attempted to shift the blame for the partially empty medical stockpile on Barack Obama, but the problem goes even deeper. An analysis by Hot Air found that Presidents Obama and George W. Bush had both used stockpiled supplies without replenishing them. President Trump also neglected to restock the cache in his first three years. It was a failure of both parties that, in a time of record-breaking federal spending, no one thought to refill the emergency medical stockpile.
While troubling, the situation could be much worse if social distancing steps had not been implemented when they were. If the exponential growth in COVID-19 cases had continued, the situation would be even more dire. By flattening the curve, we have more time to prepare for a possible onslaught of new cases. If the critics of the economic pause and self-isolation had their way, there would be many more cases in the near term with a corresponding shortage of supplies that would dramatically increase the ultimate death toll.

Originally published on The Resurgent

Monday, September 15, 2008

The Economics of Oil Prices

This past weekend oil prices shot to near-record highs again after several months of decline. While on a weekend trip to visit the grandparents, we were unpleasantly surprised to see gas prices climbing as quickly as the gas station attendants could change their signs. Even at high prices, many stations were selling completely out of gasoline.

To understand the reason for the fluctuations, we must first see the big picture. Oil prices have been increasing over the last few years for a number of reasons. More demand is one of the most important factors. The United States has been using more oil every year. The demand of other countries is increasing as well. China and India are both becoming industrialized nations. As they industrialize, they use vastly more oil than they did in the past.

Additionally, much of the easily tapped oil has already been drilled. Oil fields are increasingly difficult and expensive to tap. Even nations like Saudi Arabia have already pumped much of their easily accessible reserves. New oil fields are often found far out to sea or in very inhospitable areas, such as the arctic. There are new sources of oil, such as Colorado’s oil shale, but many of these are also more expensive to produce. Many oil-rich areas are also politically unstable, which makes the supply of oil uncertain.

Furthermore, oil prices have also been affected by the weak US dollar over the last few years. When the dollar is weak relative to other currencies, it takes more dollars to pay for the same barrel of oil.

Over the summer, oil prices have been driven down by several factors. First, high oil prices did what global warming alarmists were unable to accomplish: They persuaded people around the world to use less oil. Oil demand declined in the first half of 2008 and is forecast to continue falling in 2009.

Basic economic theory is that as prices rise, demand will fall. This has been true in other oil spikes as well. When oil prices increased sharply in the 1970s and 1980s, they led to economic slowdowns, which, in turn, caused the price of oil to drop. In the 1980s, the price of oil not only dropped, it collapsed and didn’t recover for about twenty years.

The dollar also gained over the summer of 2008. As the dollar grew stronger, the relative price of oil decreased. As the dollar increased in its value, it took fewer dollars to buy each barrel of oil.

A final factor in the oil price decline was President Bush’s decision to repeal the presidential ban on offshore oil drilling in mid-July 2008. Conservative estimates are that there are at least 18 billion barrels of oil off the coasts of the United States that are currently off limits to oil companies. Drilling will still not be allowed unless the congressional ban is allowed to expire, but President Bush sent a clear message to oil producers that the supply of oil might increase dramatically in the next few years. The effect was an almost immediate decline in the price of oil.

Many people place the blame for high oil prices squarely at the feet of the oil companies. While the oil companies once had the ability to set prices, that is no longer true. Most producing countries nationalized their oil fields and facilities in the 1960s and 1970s. They then formed OPEC, a cartel tasked with organizing oil production and stabilizing prices. Currently oil-producing countries set the price for their oil and buyers simply choose whether to buy or not. Given the high demand for oil, usually the choice is to buy regardless of price.

There are few cures for high oil prices. One is to reduce demand. This can be accomplished through alternative energy sources. One of the most practical solutions is to shift to electrical power. Electricity could be supplied cheaply through nuclear, wind, and solar power. All of these energy sources require large capital investments to start, however. Costs to consumers for new cars and home heating systems would also be significant. Conservation is promising way of reducing demand as well.

Increasing oil supplies is the other way to reduce oil prices. Billions of barrels of domestic oil reserves are going unused because of environmentalist-inspired bans on drilling. These oil reserves could be used to buy time to shift to other energy sources. Because much of the pre-production work has already been done, these oil reserves could be brought to market in as little as two years.

Supply could also be increased by new sources of oil. A process to turn coal into gasoline was invented by the Germans in WWII. Since the US has some of the world’s largest reserves of coal, this process holds much promise. Due to large investments for facilities to process the coal, this is not cost effective when oil is cheap, but is being considered now.

A common question is why retail gasoline prices rise faster than oil prices. The answer can be found in how gas stations are supplied. Over the past few years, gas stations have only been making a few cents profit on each gallon of gasoline. When gas prices rise, the station owner knows that his next shipment of gasoline is going to be more expensive. He raises prices so that he will be able to pay for the next shipment of gasoline. If he doesn’t increase the price immediately, he knows that he will lose money.

Conversely, when prices fall, the gas station owner sees an opportunity to make a little more profit for a short time. As he loses customers to gas stations with lower prices, he will eventually have to lower his own prices or be stuck with a large inventory of gasoline.

Last weekend, the run on gas stations had several factors. One is that the newest refinery in the US is over thirty years old. Due to government restrictions and costs, refinery capacity has not kept pace with increasing demand. As a result, US refineries are operating at about 97% capacity. When there is any interruption, such as that caused by Hurricane Ike, there is the possibility of an interruption of supply and a resulting shortage.

Another factor is that the public was panicking. Even though news reports were saying that there was no possibility of a shortage, as prices rose, the word went out among friends and families that it was time to fill up, before prices rose further. This created an artificial surge in demand. As economic law tells us, when demand rises, price follows. As station owners saw that they were going to sell out, it was obvious that it was better for them to sell out at a higher price than a lower one.

This may strike some as price gouging, but it can actually be a good thing. Rising prices prevent hoarding by those who don’t need the product. If someone doesn’t need gas, they won’t pay the higher price. Therefore the gas will be available for someone who does need it and is willing to pay the higher price. If the price stayed low, then hoarders would quickly snap up all available supplies.

Oil prices will probably decline again in the next few weeks, but $100 per barrel oil is likely here to stay. As long as demand remains high and supplies are constrained with no slack available at the production facilities, we should prepare for price spikes every time there is an interruption, whether real or perceived. The only real answers are to reduce demand through conservation and alternative energy sources, while simultaneously boosting supply and production in the short term.

Sources:
The Prize, Daniel Yergin, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1991
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/analysis_publications/oil_market_basics/demand_text.htm
http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/future-oil-production/2008/05/22/
http://www.api.org/Newsroom/us_june08_oil_demand.cfm?renderforprint=1
http://www.ogj.com/display_article/339235/7/ONART/none/GenIn/1/IEA-cuts-2008,-2009-oil-demand-forecasts/
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/14/bush.offshore/index.html