Thursday, January 6, 2022

Days of infamy: Before January 6 and after

 One year ago, the United States experienced a very dark day. But in reality, the Capitol riot and the insurrection were not just one dark day in American history. They were the culmination of a concerted effort by Donald Trump to overturn the will of the people as expressed through the 2020 presidential election. What’s more, the problems did not go away as Congress accepted the results of the Electoral College count and as the sun set on January 6, 2021. We are still living with the fact that none of the ringleaders of what can accurately be described as a coup attempt have been held accountable and the possibility that they may try again.

Like September 11, referring to the Capitol insurrection as “January 6” is a shorthand, but it is one that misses the real problem. The riot was bad. So were the ransacking of the Capitol and the assaults on Capitol Police officers. The real problem, however, was the blatant attempt to steal the election and with it, the office of the president.

By Tyler Merbler from USA - DSC09523-2, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=98637510

Republican leaders who played footsie with Trump after the election probably never saw the revolt coming, although this blindness may have been willful. As Trump launched his salvos of lawsuits in the battleground states, the consensus among the traditional Republicans left in leadership seemed to be, “Just humor him. He’ll tucker himself out and finally give up and go home.”

Trump never got tired of playing the victim and stoking the anger of his supporters. At noon, a year ago, then-President Trump began speaking to his supporters at the Stop the Steal rally and told them, “If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.”

Trump closed his speech by inviting the crowd to march on the Capitol, telling them, “So we're going to, we're going to walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I love Pennsylvania Avenue. And we're going to the Capitol, and we're going to try and give.”

What Trump was going to “try and give” was an excuse for Republicans in Congress to contest the Electoral votes of enough states to deny Joe Biden his victory. There are now numerous smoking guns that detail the plot to steal the election in the name of stopping the steal. These include a memo by Trump lawyer John Eastman and numerous statements by former White House advisor Peter Navarro. One of the most detailed of these was a recent interview with Rolling Stone, but Navarro also detailed the plot for posterity in his new memoir.

The plan was to have Vice President Pence throw out the Electoral votes from the battleground states that went for Biden using a pretext of fraud, never mind that the president had filed and lost more than 40 lawsuits that made the same allegations. The fraud claims were themselves a fraud.

“One of two things could happen,” Navarro told Rolling Stone. “They go back there [to the states], they look at it and they say, ‘Nope. It’s certified.’ [The votes] come back, and that would be it. Fair enough.”

“But the more likely scenario based on our assessment of the evidence was that states would withdraw any certification,” he continued. “And the election would be thrown to the House of Representatives. And even though the House is controlled by Democrats, the way votes would be counted in a presidential election decided by the House, Trump would almost certainly win.”

Navarro claims that the attack on the Capitol was never part of the plan and that “the violence overtook” the real coup effort that was underway in congressional chambers. In other words, Navarro says that the plotters didn’t want to start a riot, they just wanted to peacefully steal the election. They wanted to destroy the Constitution in order to save it.

Let’s get one thing straight. The Trump/Navarro/Eastman plot was unconstitutional on its face and based on fraud. Nothing in the Constitution allows the vice president to throw out Electoral votes on a whim. Neither does the poorly worded Electoral Count Act. If this theory was based in reality, Donald Trump would never have become president in the first place since then-Vice President Joe Biden could have just thrown out enough votes to make Hillary president.

There is nothing in the writings of the Framers or original intent that suggests that the Founders wanted the vice president to have veto power over presidential elections. The idea that a single politician could refuse to honor the votes of entire states represents the worst kind of intentional misreading of the Constitution’s clear meaning.

Thankfully, Mike Pence reached the correct conclusion that he did not have the authority to do what Trump asked and refused to block the Electoral College decision. In his courageous refusal to knuckle under to the plotters, Mike Pence may have singlehandedly prevented a civil war. As a nation, we owe him our gratitude.

Nevertheless, even after the insurrectionists were cleared from the halls of the Capitol, 147 congressional Republicans still voted to throw the election to Trump. More than half of the House Republican caucus voted to disenfranchise the states that didn’t vote the way they wanted them to.

If you expected things to get better after January 6, you’d have been wrong. While some Republicans initially criticized Trump for both stoking the fires of insurrection and his dereliction of duty in allowing the rioters to run amok for hours before calling in the National Guard or telling his supporters to stand down. The initial wave of rioters broke through the Capitol Police lines at about 1:00 p.m. but it was 3:36 p.m. before Kayleigh McEnany tweeted that Trump had deployed the National Guard. It wasn’t until 4:17 p.m. that Trump tweeted a video to his supporters, telling them, “We love you, you’re very special… but go home, and go home in peace.”

Partly because the Democrats played politics with impeachment and partly because of Trump’s hypnotic hold on the GOP, The Former Guy escaped conviction by the Senate for a second time in the wake of the riot and coup attempt. Democrats may live to regret their failure as it seems increasingly likely that Trump will once again be the Republican nominee in 2024.

The most amazing thing to me about the whole episode is the acquiescence and lack of anger that Republicans feel towards the man who turned their party into a den of thieves and an unruly mob. As a lifelong Republican until 2016, one of the things that appealed to me was the party’s stance on equality, the idea that all men are created equal and that all men are equal before the eyes of the law.

No longer. The new Trump™ Republican Party is one in which the guiding principles are whatever Trump says and thinks at the moment, even if that violates the Constitution and the law. An attitude that the ends justify the means permeates the party.

Don’t like election results? Send your members of Congress to throw them out. Your supporters start a riot and sack the Capitol? They aren’t violent criminals being prosecuted for breaking numerous laws, they are political prisoners.

Most Republicans didn’t fight to save their party from the man of lawlessness. They willingly handed it over. And not just once, but over and over. And they are poised to do it again in 2024.

I’m continuously amazed and dismayed by the Republicans that I encounter who don’t think that January 6 and its associated plots were a big deal. They look at it in terms of whataboutism and the traditional struggle between left and right. After all, they opine, the left riots too. Yeah, but riots as part of a plot to steal a presidential election are something new. For that matter, having a hostile force occupy the Capitol is a new thing as well. At least since 1814.

Republicans would like January 6 to go away, or failing that, to dismiss it as a Democratic ploy to blow the incident out of proportion for political reasons. The problem is that a literal and figurative assault on the Constitution and our very electoral system cannot be blown out of proportion. It is a YUGE deal. It shouldn’t go away or be forgotten, especially when the perpetrators are still in charge of the GOP.

At this point, I’m more frightened for the future of my country than I have ever been before. Doug Porter once wrote, “A coup attempt that goes unpunished becomes a training exercise.” That’s where we are right now.

My friend Steve Berman believes that a major threat for the future comes from the fact that Republicans have now given Democrats a blueprint for how to steal the presidency. I agree with him that both sides follow the other’s lead in a whataboutism race to the bottom.

But while I don’t disagree that the Democrats might try to follow the Trump/Eastman/Navarro model, the fact remains that Republicans did try to do it. They not only tried it, but they are unrepentant and defiant about their failed attempt. And the same GOP seems deadset on returning the same crowd to office again in 2024. To hear most Republicans talk, the response of Democrats and the media to January 6 was worse than the riot and the coup attempt themselves.

Even though I hold the Republican Party in contempt after the past six years, I’m a conservative at heart. I’d like to have a traditional conservative candidate to vote for, but at this point in our history, character is more important than policy. I draw a line against supporting anyone who supported the insurrection. Hard pass. What’s more, in the future the Senate should refuse to confirm anyone who endorsed the coup plot.

And there are signs that the Trump™ wing of the GOP is hedging its bets. Around the country, Trump supporters are campaigning to oust election officials who were didn’t look hard enough to find a few extra votes or fraud in 2020. That includes six of the seven battleground states won by Biden. That should send shivers down your spine. If these people are elected, the Trump campaign (or another trumpy candidate) wouldn’t need the vice presidency to change election results at the state level.

To put it in Josef Stalin’s terms, “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”

I don’t think that all Republicans are bad, although there are very few elected Republicans that I don’t think much less of after watching their behavior during the Trump Administration. They often say the right things but then vote based on partisan expedience.

I know a lot of people who had serious misgivings about Trump in both 2016 and 2020 but voted for him because they thought the alternative was worse. In the days after January 6, I heard a lot of these decent people say that they would never support him again. It is these people who give me hope for the future.

Everyone wants to vote for a candidate who campaigns on what they believe in. From time to time, however, we have to put platforms aside to keep people who are dangerously unqualified out of office. That was the case back in 1991 when Republicans did the right thing and rallied to defeat ex-klansman David Duke by voting for a Democrat ex-con under the slogan, “Vote for the crook, it’s important.”

As Republicans used to say once upon a time, “Character counts,” not only for the opposition candidates but for Republicans.

2016 and 2020 were those sorts of elections, especially after a full term of seeing the damage that Trump could do. We failed the character test in those years. I hope and pray that we have learned from our mistakes.

Check out the new Racket News podcast episode here!

Share

The Tweet of the Day is my post-inauguration tweet. I stand by it.

From the Racket

Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Anti-mandate or anti-vax?

 I’ve always drawn a lot of my inspiration for writing from social media. When you hang on Twitter or Facebook for a while, you can see what the politically interested are talking about and what draws a response. As Democrats have learned in the recent past, making a big splash with the Twitterati doesn’t mean that you have your finger on the pulse of the nation, but it does show where the partisans are.

That was the case yesterday when I responded to a tweet by Dan Crenshaw that argued that, “Maybe ‘shutting down the virus’ could have included promoting a variety of safe early-stage treatments, including monoclonal antibodies.” Crenshaw then went on to argue that governors were “vilified for pushing treatments over mandates.”

Photo by Daniel Schludi on Unsplash

Crenshaw is objectively wrong here, and my response was that a better way to shut down the virus was for Republicans to stop demonizing the COVID vaccines. After all, Crenshaw’s treatments do not shut down the virus since they can’t be used until someone is infected. Vaccines, on the other hand, even though they are not 100 percent effective, do stand a good chance of shutting down the virus and preventing an infection so that people never even get sick in the first place.

A lot of people took offense to that.

There were two major thrusts to the response. First, people argued that Republicans were anti-mandate rather than anti-vaccine, and second, several pointed out that some Democrats had opposed the vaccines while Trump was president.

I’ll address the second point first. I have been consistently pro-vaccine since long before the vaccines were approved. When the Democrats questioned the safety of the Trump vaccine, I disagreed.

It’s hard for many people to understand that there are quite a few of us who can disagree with both parties, often simultaneously, but here we are. If you’re consistent in your beliefs and principles, you’re going to find yourself as an outlier to both parties. That’s where I’m at.

The first point is a bit more complex. I do agree that it’s possible to be against the mandates while still being pro-vaccine. I’ve also found over the past couple of years that a lot of people claim to be anti-mandate as a cover for being anti-vaccine. A Venn diagram of anti-mandate and anti-vaccine people would have a lot of overlap, but would not be 100 percent.

As an example, I recall another conversation in which a guy told me that he wasn’t anti-vaccine but was just against mandates. When we talked further, I found that he was skeptical of vaccines because he believed a lot of anti-vax propaganda like the claim that vaccines could sterilize girls (this is not true by the way.) and that they were dangerous in various other ways as well.

It’s also not true that no Republican has ever attacked the COVID vaccines directly, another claim made by some Twitter users. We need only look back a few days to the suspension of Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) for mischaracterizing data from VAERS to make it appear that the COVID vaccines were killing people. I explained a few days ago how the VAERS data does not link adverse reactions to vaccines in a causal relationship. If you don’t believe me, it’s right there on the VAERS website in black and white.

This was a clear anti-vax attack and a very dishonest one. VAERS has been explained repeatedly to people like Greene yet they persist in their conspiracy theories. What do we call it when people persist in pushing falsehoods when they know the truth? A lie.

Lauren Boebert (R-Col.) provides another easy example of a Republican anti-vaxxer. Boebert claims to be anti-mandate, but the congresswoman, whose district has had the lowest vaccination rate in Colorado, has derided the vaccines as a “Fauci ouchie” and has made alarmist claims about a suggested door-to-door public health education campaign. She also claimed that voting Republican and turning off CNN could “make the Delta variant go away,” an apparent allegation that the entire pandemic is a hoax.

Boebert is far from the only Republican to attack health education about the vaccines. Jason Smith (R-Missouri) likened the door-knocking campaigns as “KGB-style” even though it would not force anyone to be vaccinated. And who can forget the conniptions the party went through when Big Bird got vaccinated on “Sesame Street?” To me, it seems far more anti-vaccine than anti-mandate to oppose public health education programs whose goal is to help people make an informed decision.

Even more respected Republicans like Chip Roy have jumped on the bandwagon. Roy was one of the Republicans whipping people into a frenzy about the door-knockers and took to Twitter to defend Greene after her suspension, saying “Big Healthcare doesn’t want us to discuss this.”

Republican vaccine resistance, if not outright opposition, is to a great extent a political ploy. Republicans have gloated over low vaccination rates and the winter surge as a defeat for Joe Biden (never mind that it’s bad for the country), but a large part of both talking points is that Republicans themselves have worked to undermine mitigation strategies from vaccines to masks. A large part of the GOP is resistant not only to vaccines but to almost any strategy to slow the spread of COVID. The Republican mantra has been “back to normal” since about May 2020.

One of the most insidious examples of Republican anti-vaxxerism is Ron DeSantis. It’s true that the Florida governor endorsed vaccines back in July, but it is also true that he got a lot of pushback from his base. Since then, DeSantis has increasingly flirted with the anti-vax wing of the Republican base, at one point sharing the stage with a speaker who alleged that mRNA COVID vaccines could change your DNA. (Spoiler alert: They don’t.) DeSantis has made the scientifically erroneous argument that vaccines are a personal choice that does affect others and downplayed vaccines in favor of post-infection treatments.

DeSantis obviously doesn’t believe all the anti-vax nonsense, he’s vaccinated himself, but he does see the political value in pandering to the anti-vaccine crowd. That political calculation is killing Floridians.

Since DeSantis began his war on COVID mitigations and vaccine mandates, Florida has risen steadily in terms of both cases and deaths. The Sunshine State has now passed New York to take third place in total deaths behind California and Texas. The DeSantis Administration responded yesterday with calls to reduce COVID testing, apparently taking the position that if we don’t know the extent of the COVID surge, it can't hurt us (or at least the governor's presidential aspirations).

As I began this piece, I did wonder whether Dan Crenshaw had endorsed vaccines. It took a little searching, but I did find a clip on Fox Business back in July where the Texas congressman said, “I think the vaccine is safe and effective. I also don't think you can be forced to take it.”

I appreciate that statement, but since then Crenshaw seems to have had few kind words for vaccines. Like DeSantis, he seems to have steered clear of the vaccine controversy by focusing on treatments rather than prevention. To some extent, being afraid to defend and endorse vaccines is a form of anti-vaxxerism. It certainly isn’t pro-vaccine.

In a pandemic, not being pro-vaccine isn’t much different from being anti-vax. It’s going along with the crowd and letting the tail wag the dog.

And there’s the real rub. A lot of Republican leaders don’t necessarily believe the anti-vax fearmongering that Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and others crank out on a daily basis, but they lack the moral courage to push back and tell their supporters the truth that vaccines are safe, effective, and the best way out of the pandemic.

This is not to say that all Republicans are anti-vax or are vaccine resisters. Donald Trump has become one of the few Republicans willing to stand up and defend the vaccines that his Administration helped to create. Other Republicans who have come out strongly in favor of vaccines are Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney. These and others who go against the anti-vax mob should be applauded.

I’m not against treatments for COVID-19. Treatments are an important part of the fight against the virus. But there shouldn’t be a battle between treatments and vaccines. It’s not an either/or proposition.

Vaccines have been shown to be effective at reducing COVID-19 infections, even when considering the variants. They have also been shown to be even more effective at preventing serious cases of the illness that lead to hospitalization or death. The best solution is to get vaccinated and hope you don’t get infected. If you do, treatments are the second line of defense.

I stand by my original claim that Republicans who have demonized the vaccine should follow Donald Trump’s example and admit that the shots are not only safe, they are medical marvels that greatly reduce the danger of COVID-19. That also goes for those Republicans who are trying to play it both ways.

We need more Republicans who are courageous enough to stand up and tell the truth, even when the crowd doesn’t want to hear it - especially when the crowd doesn’t want to hear it - but the situation we have now is one in which the people would rather believe a dystopian lie than the truth, and their leaders are afraid to challenge them.

Don’t forget to check back tomorrow to hear the newest Racketeer podcast on the anniversary of the January 6 insurrection.

Share

I’m going to close with a Facebook screenshot from a friend in my hometown. I’ve deidentified the picture, but the man is a staunch Republican and I’m almost certain that he wasn’t vaccinated when he and his family got COVID over Christmas break.

The current surge of Omicron may be milder than previous variants, but that doesn’t mean that is not dangerous. It’s also true that Delta still lurks in many parts of the country. The post below was from January 2.

Image

The last post on his timeline is below and was dated January 3. The situation sounds dire and shows some of the problems with relying on treatments after you’ve been infected.

I share these screenshots for two reasons. One is that my friend, Tim, could use your prayers. The second is as a cautionary tale. Don’t let this happen to you. Get vaccinated.

I think that Tim stands a decent chance of surviving based on his oxygen level, but his body has been wracked with COVID for weeks now, and even if he lives, he may have a long road to recovery. Christmas, which should be a happy time, was transformed into a season of sadness and pain for his family.

The saddest part is that it was unnecessary. Tim (probably) and many people suffering from COVID right now could have had a very mild case or not gotten sick at all if they had only gotten vaccinated.

From the Racket

Monday, January 3, 2022

VACCINE MATH: Why Anti-Vax Claims Don't Add Up

 For the third straight year, Coronavirus cases are once again seeing a winter surge. Both personally and online, I’ve heard many folks say that they are testing positive and feeling horrible. Among the cases that I’ve recently become aware of are my fellow conservative commentators, Jonah Goldberg and David French, both of whom were vaccinated. This leads to a question that I hear often these days, namely, “If so many people are vaccinated then why are COVID cases increasing?”

As with many questions that can fit easily on a meme or a bumper sticker, the answer has several parts and is complex. Very often, the people asking the question aren’t really interested in the answer and are just asking the question to make a point. Or maybe their eyes glaze over before it can be adequately explained. At any rate, these phenomena help the pointed question to spread much more quickly than the answer.

Photo by Martin Sanchez on Unsplash

The first part of the answer is the most obvious and that’s that breakthrough infections exist. What’s more, as COVID-19 mutates, breakthrough infections are becoming more common because the current vaccines were based on the original alpha strain.

This leads to another common objection from the anti-vax/anti-mandate crowd, which often avers that the vaccines are worthless because they don’t block 100 percent of infections. I’ve even been told that COVID vaccines are not real vaccines because they don’t block all new infections and/or because booster shots are needed.

This is a logical fallacy called “raising the bar” or “moving the goalposts” that shows that that the objectors don’t really understand vaccines. After all, no vaccine is 100 percent effective and many require more than one dose. In fact, one of the most commonly used vaccines, the flu vaccine, is only effective for one flu season and averages about 40 percent effectiveness at preventing infection, yet no one denies that the flu vaccine is a real vaccine.

While it’s still too early to put a number on the effectiveness of the COVID vaccines against Omicron, the three-dose course is almost certainly more effective at preventing the disease than the flu vaccine, and perhaps more importantly, the three COVID vaccines used in the US are very effective at preventing serious cases of COVID that require hospitalization. A Johnson & Johnson booster was rated as 85 percent effective against hospitalization and three doses of the Pfizer vaccine were found to increase effectiveness 25-fold over two doses. A third dose of Moderna reportedly increases effectiveness 37-fold.

The important thing to remember is that vaccines don’t have to be impenetrable to be valuable. As an analogy, a bulletproof vest is not a guarantee that no bullet can hurt you. Bullets can strike your body in unprotected areas and large caliber bullets might even penetrate through the vest. Still, body armor gives you an edge over being totally unprotected and if I was going to be in a firefight, I’d rather have partial protection than none at all.

The next set of figures to consider are vaccination rates. As of December 30, Vermont was the state with the highest rate of vaccinations at 77 percent. That sounds like a lot, but 77 percent is not nearly enough for herd immunity, especially considering the diminished effectiveness of vaccines against the new variants. With a population of about 624,000 people, that leaves 143,000 Vermonters who are either unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated. In either case, they are highly vulnerable to COVID-19.

The 143,000 undervaccinated Vermonters provide an ample breeding ground for the virus. Vermont reported 1,352 new cases at press time, which is only a fraction of the pool of undervaccinated citizens.

But wait, you say, a lot of those people have natural immunity since they are COVID survivors. But natural antibodies have the same problems recognizing and defending against the mutant COVID variants that vaccine-created antibodies do. Even before Omicron, a study showed that unvaccinated COVID survivors were more than twice as likely to be reinfected as people who were vaccinated.

Breakdowns in the data also confirm that the COVID outbreak in Vermont is chiefly a pandemic of the unvaccinated. The current data summary shows that only 2.4 percent of fully vaccinated Vermonters have experienced breakthrough infections. More detailed demographics from November show that COVID rates were highest among 0-11-year-olds, a demographic that had a very low vaccination rate.

More recent data from Vermont shows that the undervaccinated are both more likely to be infected and to require hospitalization. People who are not fully vaccinated are about four times as likely to get infected and account for about three-quarters of COVID hospitalizations despite making up less than a quarter of the population. For every age group, the undervaccinated account for more COVID cases than the vaccinated. These trends hold true almost everywhere with very few exceptions.

One bit of data that wasn’t available in the Vermont reports, but that is included in the online data from my home state of Georgia is that only 4.3 percent of breakthrough cases have had booster shots. Charts depicting the numbers of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths confirm that being fully vaccinated is safer than being unvaccinated, but having a booster is safer than being just fully vaccinated.

So there’s the answer to the question. While there are a few breakthrough cases, the vast majority of COVID cases are among people who are not fully vaccinated. Now, the next time you see someone make the fallacious claim that COVID cases go up as vaccination rates go up, you’ll be armed to point out the errors in their logic.

There’s an old saying that correlation does not equal causation, and that’s the case here. Vaccination rates are going up, but that’s not driving the surge in COVID cases. Instead, the problem is that vaccination rates are not going up enough.

Share

One of Marjorie Taylor Greene’s accounts was permanently banned from Twitter over the weekend. Rep. Greene’s official account, @RepMTG, remains active while her notorious personal account, @mtgreenee, has been removed.

The Georgia Republican reportedly tweeted a graph that purported to show data from VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, showing a dramatic increase in vaccine deaths from the COVID vaccines. Chip Roy (R-Texas) retweeted what he claims is the same data on his account.

VAERS data has been used by Greene and others to attempt to paint the COVID vaccines as dangerous, but what many people don’t realize is that the “adverse” events reported in the system are not necessarily due to the vaccine.

The VAERS website explains:

VAERS is a passive reporting system, meaning it relies on individuals to send in reports of their experiences to CDC and FDA. VAERS is not designed to determine if a vaccine caused a health problem [emphasis mine], but is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse event reporting that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine.

It goes back to the question of correlation or causation. VAERS deals with correlation but does not confirm a causative relationship.

Take my case for example. Back in November, I got my Moderna booster shot. A few days later, I was out running and had a bad fall. I landed mostly on my face, breaking my nose, and needed stitches in my face and knees. I was really, really sore for about a week.

Enter the V-Safe post-vaccine check-in. When I got the next few follow-up texts, I could honestly say that I had a new onset of symptoms that included muscle aches and a cough that was attributed to drainage from my broken nose. The check-in form only asks about symptoms. It doesn’t ask if they were caused by the vaccine, the virus, or something else.

I couldn’t find a definitive answer on whether V-Safe check-ins are fed into VAERS, but the principle is the same. Both V-Safe and VAERS are raw data and neither considers whether the symptom is linked to the vaccine.

To date, there have been more than 508 million COVID vaccine doses administered in the US. With anything that common, there will be adverse reactions afterward. If you did a hot dog check-in and followed every hot dog-eater for a few weeks after their meal, you’d find lots of health problems and thousands of deaths, but that doesn’t mean the hot dogs caused those adverse reactions. (Then again, it might be related in some cases given the nutritional value of hot dogs, especially if they are a regular staple rather than an occasional treat.) And that’s what you see in VAERS.

An additional error is that COVID vaccines are far more common than most of the other vaccines. More than 508 million COVID vaccine doses have been administered in the US alone, almost all of them in 2021. By way of comparison, about 180 million flu vaccines are administered annually. When only raw numbers are considered, it is logical that more doses would result in more adverse reactions.

Marjorie Taylor Greene abused her Twitter account. Over the past few months, she repeatedly violated the Terms of Service with tweets that included anti-vaccine propaganda, conspiracy theories, comparing pandemic mitigations to the Holocaust, and QAnon. No one has a right to access a private platform. That includes presidents and members of Congress.

Twitter was right to ban her. Frankly, I don’t know why it took so long.

Good riddance.


I’m not a big fan of New Year’s resolutions, but I’ve got one this year. As some of you know (because I mentioned it in the last section), I like to run. Last year, I decided to run a 10K (6.2 miles) once a week and I’ve mostly kept to that goal.

For 2022, I’ve decided that I want to run a half-marathon. A marathon is 26.2 miles so a half is 13.1 miles. I’ve run this distance informally a couple of times, but I’ve never done an actual race at that distance. I think 2022 is going to be my year though.


On today’s Tweet of the Day, I’m going to toot my own horn. As my dad likes to say, “He that tooteth not his own horn, getteth the same not tooted.” This one needs no explanation.