Friday, April 24, 2026

MAGA FAs and FOs

 


Let me start off by saying that this is not an aviation post. If you clicked here to read about MAGA flight attendants and first officers, I’m sorry to disappoint you, but stick around because I’ve got some interesting thoughts on other subjects. 

The FA and FO that I had in mind is a common phrase these days. If you don’t know what it means, it’s an acronym containing the same, not suitable for family values voters word that was in the “Let’s go, Brandon” chant. To clean it up a little, I’ll say it means “Fart Around, Find Out.” Essentially, it means that when something bad happens to someone, they had it coming. 

person holding persons hand
Photo credit: Dan Burton/Unsplash.com

Share

MAGA’s FAFO moment came on Tuesday when Virginia voters decided that they wanted to cast aside the state’s fair and balanced congressional districts and replace them with a new map that will likely net Democrats a total of 10 seats and leave Republicans with one. When the votes were counted on Tuesday, there was much weeping, gnashing of teeth, and rending of garments from the MAGA set.

Ironically, most of the people who were upset on Tuesday were cheering last year when Texas redrew its congressional map. To hear the MAGA crowd talk about it, Virginia’s referendum was a shot fired out of the blue at constitutional democracy. 

“Virginia is about 55 percent Democrats, and they want to force by majority vote that the state send 91 percent Democratic representation to Congress,” Republicans argue, but what they conveniently forget to mention is that Virginia was a response to Texas. Some probably really have forgotten about Texas, because I’ve seen several people online threatening to have Texas reconfigure its districts yet again.

For those who don’t remember, let me bring you up to speed. States typically redraw congressional districts after a census, which occurs every 10 years. After Republicans saw gains in Hispanic voters in 2024, Donald Trump urged Texas Republicans to redraw their lines again to gerrymander the state’s congressional seats in an attempt to blunt expected Democratic gains elsewhere in the midterms. It was abnormal, but not unconstitutional. The Texas legislature approved the new map in August 2025, and Gov. Gregg Abbott signed the measure into law. 

In response, California Democrats put Proposition 50 on the ballot to draw new congressional districts that would gerrymander away several Republican seats. That measure passed in November and is expected to erase many of the extra seats Republicans hope to gain in Texas.

But it didn’t end there. Other states, including Maryland and New York, also considered action. Virginia actually put it to the voters, and the voters said, “Go for it.” 

The redistricting war did not begin in New York in 2024, as some claim, by the way. New York’s map was approved in 2024, but the process started years earlier and was delayed by litigation. It was not a mid-decade redistricting attempt. 

So the Republicans may (more on that later) get a handful of seats from Texas, but they will lose them in California, where redistricting used to be based on maps drawn by an independent commission, and Virginia, which formerly had one of the fairest maps in the country. 

Republicans may have awakened a sleeping beast. Both states take advantage of gerrymandering, but of the states that try to draw fair maps, most are Democrat-leaning, while quite a few red states have only one or two congressional districts. 

The Texas mid-decade gerrymandering war has moved us backwards from what I’d like to see: nonpartisan districts everywhere and a national gerrymandering ban. I think that gerrymandering is to blame for a lot of the extremism in both wings of American politics because politicians who don’t have a viable opposition party have no reason not to be as extreme as possible to win the primary. 

But that dream is going to have to come from the legislatures because, as I said earlier, gerrymandering is not unconstitutional. As recently as 2023, the Supreme Court held that gerrymandering is permissible with the exception of drawing districts that are racially discriminatory, except to the extent that racial discrimination is required by the Voting Rights Act. If that sounds like a tight line to haul, it really isn’t because, to a great extent, racial lines are also political lines, at least for some groups. Gerrymandering usually faces a low bar for lawfulness. 

So don’t fret about the recent injunction from a state judge that seeks to invalidate the results of Tuesday’s election. Remember that both Texas and California had legal challenges to their new maps. The Supreme Court affirmed both redistricting plans. In Virginia’s case, the state supreme court overturned previous rulings that would have killed the referendum.

I can also point out that both California and Virginia put their gerrymandered maps to the voters; Texas did not. If there are any complaints to be made about the lack of democracy in gerrymandered maps, they should be directed towards the Texas statehouse in Austin, but newfound Republican critics of gerrymandering never seem to have problems with the Texan casus belli.

And that brings us to the potential fly in Texas’s ointment, namely the looming possibility of a blue wave election amid what is turning out to be Republican unpopularity of historic proportions. You see, gerrymandering is often accomplished in a way that gives districts a lopsided partisan majority, making them safe for the party in power. However, Trump’s Texas redistricting did the opposite. Republicans assumed that Hispanic voters who voted Republican in 2024 were part of a new permanent majority and redrew lines to encompass their new red Hispanic voters. If that is a bad assumption, then Republicans may have just diluted their strength. turning safe districts into battlegrounds. 

And it looks extremely doubtful that Hispanics will stay red. A recent AP-NORC poll found that Trump’s approval among Hispanics had fallen to about 25 percent after an estimated 42 percent voted Trump in 2024. Who could have imagined that treating Hispanics and immigrants like criminals who were presumed guilty would backfire at the polls?

The cratering among Hispanics is only part of public opinion turning against Trump and the Republicans nationwide. Trump’s overall approval is only 43 percent in Texas, and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick recently said that Republicans will have a “tough time” keeping their majority in the state House. 

When the full story of the redistricting war is written, it may be said that Trump broke norms to try to pick up a few seats and ended up losing several states, including Texas. People say that Texas will never go blue, but Trump may have found a way.

One of many lessons to be learned, both in Texas and Iran, is that bullying only gets you so far. When you make people angry enough that they start fighting back, things can go south pretty quickly. 

FAFO.


From the Racket News

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

mRNA in the USA!

 It isn’t often that we get earth-shattering good news these days, but we did last weekend. It’s my pleasure to pass along the news that we may have cured pancreatic cancer. 

Pancreatic cancer is one of the scary ones, even by cancer standards, where every diagnosis is scary. It’s difficult to test for, so by the time you’re diagnosed, it’s often terminal. Treatments have had a low probability of success. Per NBC News, fewer than 13 percent of people with pancreatic cancer live past five years. 

Until now. 

Image created by ChatGPT

Share

The big medical news over the weekend was the result of a long-term trial that used an experimental mRNA vaccine to attack pancreatic cancer cells. The trial began in 2019, a year before mRNA vaccines became widely known during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientists tailored vaccines to the specific cancer cells in each of 16 patients in the trial. In eight patients, the vaccine triggered immune system cells to attack the invasive cancer cells. Seven of these patients are still alive after four to six years. Of the eight patients whose immune systems did not respond, the median survival time was 3.4 years. Only two were still alive when the announcement was made. 

The study represents a giant step forward in the fight against pancreatic cancer, but it is not a panacea. Participants in the trial first had to have surgery to have the tumor removed, but surgery is only possible in about 20 percent of cases. The 50 percent success rate of the experimental vaccine is still long odds, even if it’s much better than no treatment. 

While the advancement is important in the fight against pancreatic cancer, this treatment is only the beginning. The same technology shows promise against many other diseases and forms of cancer. There are already vaccines for other forms of cancer in the works, including prostate cancer

[As an aside, let me point out that the phrase “a cure for cancer” is a bit misleading.] There are many types of cancer, and some of them are more curable than others. There is not likely to ever be a single cure for cancer, but we are likely to see an increasing number of successful treatments for various forms of the disease, that’s why I use the plural term “cures for cancer.” Former Senator Ben Sasse, who announced that he has metastatic pancreatic cancer last December, is reportedly in a separate trial.] 

The promise of the new technology is what makes it so ironic and tragic that Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. head up the federal government at this momentous point in medical history. Cancer research was a big target and a big loser in Elon Musk’s DOGE war on federal spending. In the first half of 2025, the Trump Administration cut 1800 grants and $8 billion in cancer research funding. RFKJR’s HHS continued with an emphasis on cutting research into mRNA vaccines, a favorite bogeyman of the anti-vax right, despite their real world successes. 

Some anti-vax conspiracy theories are based on a misunderstanding of what mRNA vaccines do. Contrary to popular belief, they do not change your DNA. Rather, as the National Medicine Library explains, mRNA vaccines introduce a protein that corresponds to proteins found in a virus or other foreign cell. The body’s cells then produce antibodies that target the protein, fighting off the foreign cells. 

Other conspiracy theories claim that mRNA vaccines cause so-called “turbo cancer,”rather than cure diseases. While it is true that there had been a surge of cancer cases among younger people, the increase predates the advent of mRNA vaccines and is likely due to lifestyle factors. There is no known link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and cancer, “turbo” (which does not exist) or otherwise. In fact, some studies have identified potential benefits from the COVID vaccines in fighting cancer.

A favorite trope of Trump supporters has been, “Trump could cure cancer, and you’d still hate him.” The chances of Trump curing cancer are about the same as the chances of Trump flying to the moon by flapping his arms, but the reality is closer to the opposite. Trump and his cohorts not only did not cure cancer, they cut the funding for numerous promising research programs and undermined public faith in mRNA, a technology that has the potential to remake medicine as we know it. Trump killed cures for cancer, yet his base still loves and trusts him. 

There are few areas where MAGA has been so dramatically, tragically wrong as it has been with its opposition to mRNA vaccines and research. Research will go on, but precious time is being lost because of the loss of federal funding. Many scientists will go to other countries where more funding is available, and for many scientists and doctors who are immigrants, to places where there are more friendly immigration policies. They will take their American education and work for our competitors because our government no longer wants immigrants. 

A few years might not seem like much, but if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a fast-moving disease like pancreatic cancer, days matter. The loss of four or more years of research could be the difference between life and death. 

Because I frequently beat up on President Trump, I will also give him some credit here. During his first term, Trump signed the Right to Try Act, a law that allows terminal patients access to experimental trials. If a patient is likely to die anyway, they should have the right to try new treatments, even if they are in the testing stage. Give them a shot at life. 

Nevertheless, as a two-time cancer patient (read about my experience here), I take it personally that the Administration has made such draconian cuts to such promising programs. That’s especially true since any savings from DOGE have been squandered on spending increases for items like the massive growth of ICE and the war on Iran (more than $1 billion per day). Spending and borrowing have increased under Trump, even as cancer research was thrown under the bus. 

It’s a sign of the times that we can get confirmation of the existence of UFOs or a promising new treatment for one of the most deadly strains of cancer, and no one bats an eye. So much for all the old movies in which characters opined that the government couldn’t tell the truth about UFOs without causing a mass panic. I guess we just needed a trumpian dumpster fire as a distraction when they dropped that rhetorical bomb, but the news of the pancreatic cancer vaccine is news that deserves to be celebrated far and wide. 

There is mounting evidence that America bet on the wrong horse in 2024, but none so stark as the realization that we chose tariffs and unnecessary wars over cures for cancer. We will have an opportunity to correct that mistake, starting in just a few months. We should fire those members of Congress who offer Trump their unquestioning support and hire those who will restore funding to cancer research projects and rein in an out-of-control president. 

We are on the cusp of a tremendous scientific breakthrough that has been dreamed of for generations, but like the old joke about what makes airplanes fly (the answer is “money”), highly technical medical research also takes large piles of cash, and when large piles of cash are required, for better or worse, usually the primary source is the federal government. 

If the issue for the midterms is spending to create cures for cancer or deport elderly immigrant grandparents, I’m pretty sure I know what Americans will choose. 

Thanks for reading The Racket News ™! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

VIRGINIA VOTES Virginia voted to redistrict to add Democrat seats in response to Texas’ mid-decade redistricting.

TACO TUESDAY Trump extended the Iran ceasefire indefinitely. 

FLU NOT Pete Hegseth announced that US troops would no longer be required to get annual flu vaccinations.


From the Racket News