Friday, January 28, 2022

Gog me with a spoon

 I’m pretty sure everyone else is going to lead off with the retirement of Justice Stephen Breyer today, but we really don’t know that much about the situation yet, so y’all are just going to have to wait until later in the piece for my take on it. To start with, I’m going to talk about something that I started pondering while hiking yesterday: Gog of Magog.

If the phrase “Gog of Magog” doesn’t sound familiar to you, I’m sure that you aren’t alone. It comes from a rather obscure Biblical prophecy found in chapter 38 of Ezekiel. Ezekiel 38:2-4 contains a description of Gog:

“Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshek and Tubal; prophesy against him and say: ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am against you, Gog, chief prince of Meshek and Tubal. I will turn you around, put hooks in your jaws and bring you out with your whole army—your horses, your horsemen fully armed, and a great horde with large and small shields, all of them brandishing their swords.”

Putin holds a video call with U.S. President Joe Biden on 7 December 2021 By, CC BY 4.0,


The prophecy is obscure for a couple of reasons. First, it isn’t one of the more well-known Biblical prophecies, but it also isn’t clear as to what it means or who Gog is. The reason that I thought about it yesterday was that Russian aggression is once again in the news, and many Biblical scholars think that the prophecy may point towards a latter-day confrontation between Russia and Israel.

Back in 2008, I wrote a blog post that describes the theology and scholarship regarding Gog of Magog. Suffice it to say that clues in the passage above point towards Russia as the home of Gog of Magog, whoever he might be. The entire prophecy speaks of an alliance that Gog will lead against Israel in a war that many theologians believe will take place prior to the end-time events of the Revelation that most of us are familiar with.

My purpose here is not to speculate that Vladimir Putin is Gog and that he will veer south to attack Israel at some point (although that was on my mind in 2008). I think that there is way too much twisting of prophecy in an attempt to make it fit the events of the day. I’ve gotten to the point where I think a lot of the church is like the ancient Israelites who read so much into the prophecies and had so many expectations of how they would be fulfilled, that they didn’t recognize it when prophecy was unveiled before their eyes. In my opinion, it doesn’t pay to be dogmatic about how prophecy will be fulfilled.

Rather, the thought that I had as I walked was that it was curious that so many evangelicals seem to be enamored with Vladimir Putin when Russia has traditionally been on the wrong side of end-time events according to our interpretations of eschatology.

Like a lot of other Christians, I developed an intense interest in eschatology in the 1990s as I read Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins’s “Left Behind” series. My curiosity inspired me to dig deeper and I ended up reading a lot of books about prophecy. The authors of a lot of these books, including LaHaye, Joel Rosenberg, and John Hagee, identified the Gog prophecy with Russia. Even the Rapture Ready Index, a three-decades-old compilation of factors believed to be associated with the end times, equates Gog with Russia (the index currently stands only three points below its all-time high from 2016).

Given the prevailing view among evangelicals that Russia will one day attack Israel and incur God’s wrath, I had to wonder why it was that so many conservative Christian Americans are sympathetic to Putin’s Russia. After all, prophecy aside, there are many reasons to keep your distance from Putin, both metaphorically and literally speaking. The guy is a former KGB officer, he has started three wars, and people who criticize him tend to turn up dead or disappear into whatever they call the gulags these days.

Frankly, I don’t have a good answer, although I could offer some theories. The most obvious is the ongoing political realignment that I wrote about earlier this week in which the Republican Party, at least partly led by Donald Trump, moves towards a more pro-Russia position. Some might also view Putin as God’s instrument after Russia meddling in the 2016 election put Trump over the top. Less obvious is the Matthew 24:24 possibility (or warning) that Christians can be deceived by false prophets.

One thing that I don’t see evidence for is the idea that Christian supporters of Putin are purposely trying to speed up the end-times timeline by helping prophecy along. While this is an occasional trope in books and films, I’ve never seen anyone with this attitude in the church. These people may exist, but they aren’t common.

If anything, I’d say that more Christians would be the opposite. The fears about implanted chips, cashless transactions, and the Mark of the Beast, not to mention the whole idea of Making America Great Again, seem to indicate a belief that political action might delay the Second Coming. (I also find it curious that so many Christians seem to be preparing to live through the Tribulation when most evangelicals believe in a pre-Tribulation rapture, but I digress.)

In reality, God is going to work on God’s timeline. Nothing man can do is going to speed up or delay his ultimate plan. It will happen when it happens and it will come like a “thief in the night.”

At any rate, the whole matter is curious and seems to reflect a shift in thinking among evangelicals about the end-times and Russia’s (or at least Putin’s) role in prophecy.

In the end, we don’t know for certain that the Gog prophecy has anything to do with Russia, but we also don’t know that it doesn’t. When in doubt, don’t trust former members of the KGB.


Now, on the Supreme Court…

Justice Stephen Breyer announced his intention to retire from the Supreme Court yesterday. Breyer, an 83-year-old who was appointed by Bill Clinton, will serve until the end of the current term.

The Democrats have been burned when it comes to recent Supreme Court nominations. First, Mitch McConnell declined to act on the appointment of Merrick Garland in 2016 and then Hillary Clinton lost the election, giving Donald Trump the opportunity to appoint three new justices, including a replacement for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died in the runup to the 2020 election. These confirmations were the unequivocal high point of the Trump Administration, but for Democrats, they stung.

I have to believe that Breyer was considering all this when he announced his retirement. By retiring now, before the 2022 midterms, Majority Leader Schumer will be running the circus that is our confirmation process.

Does anyone really think that if Mitch McConnell was running the Senate that he wouldn’t defer the confirmation for two years until the voters had a chance to weigh in? And then another four if the Democrats win the White House again in 2024? I thought not.

I won’t speculate on who Biden will appoint except to say that he made a campaign promise to nominate the first black woman to the Supreme Court. Beyond that, his nominee is going to have to gain the Manchin-Sinema seal of approval, so he can’t nominate someone too far to the left. I wouldn't be surprised if Biden's pick even gets a few Republican votes.

I don’t think that the Supreme Court will be a big issue in the midterms for two reasons. One, Breyer is one of the Court’s liberals so a Biden appointee won’t shift the balance of the Court, which currently leans to the right. Second, the confirmation will be ancient history and forgotten by November.

Clarence Thomas, 73, is the second-oldest currently serving justice. If something happens to Thomas, all bets are off.

The FDA revoked its approval for monoclonal antibodies as a treatment for the Omicron variant of COVID-19 on Tuesday, prompting a tirade from the DeSantis Administration in Florida. DeSantis, leery of promoting vaccines and offending the anti-vax members of the GOP base, had invested heavily in monoclonal antibody treatments for the Sunshine State.

Per the Orlando Sentinel, DeSantis claimed the decision was based on “a single, non-peer-reviewed, non-clinical study that was actually done by a consultant for a rival company to the other two monoclonal antibody treatments. ... It’s really a reckless decision to be able to take this option away from patients.”

In reality, both Regeneron and Eli Lilly acknowledge that their treatments are not effective against Omicron. That’s pretty strange behavior for Big Pharma companies that could be raking in boatloads of cash for selling their treatments in a pandemic… if they worked.

Daniel Dale provides written evidence that DeSantis is lying in our Tweet of the Day.

No comments: